Proving Differentiability of f at $x_0$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the differentiability of a complex function \( f \) at an inner point \( x_0 \) of its domain \( D \). Participants explore two conditions that are proposed to be equivalent to differentiability, engaging in mathematical reasoning and definitions related to limits and continuity.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests defining \( \alpha \) as the limit \( \lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0} \) to prove condition (i).
  • Another participant confirms this approach as valid.
  • Participants discuss the implication of differentiability leading to the existence of \( \alpha \) and the conditions outlined in (i).
  • There is a proposal to define \( r(x) \) as \( \frac{f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)}{x-x_0} \) and to check its continuity.
  • One participant attempts to prove the continuity of \( r \) by evaluating the limit as \( x \) approaches \( x_0 \).
  • Participants inquire about the necessity of showing that both conditions (i) and (ii) imply differentiability.
  • There is a discussion on how to derive differentiability from both conditions, with participants outlining the steps involved.
  • Final confirmations are made regarding the correctness of the reasoning presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the approaches taken to prove the conditions for differentiability, but the discussion includes exploratory reasoning and uncertainty about specific definitions and implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions of continuity and the implications of the conditions for differentiability, indicating that some assumptions may need clarification.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :giggle:

I want to prove the following:

If $x_0$ is an inner point of $D$ ($x_0 \in \text{int } D$), so the differentiability of $f$ at $x_0$ is equivalent to each of the following two conditions.
(i) $\exists \alpha\in \mathbb{C}$ : $\forall \epsilon>0 \ \exists \delta>0\ \forall x\in B(x_0,\delta): \ |f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)|\leq \epsilon |x-x_0|$
(ii) There is a $\delta>0$, $\alpha\in \mathbb{C}$ and $r\in B(x_0, \delta)\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ continuous at $x_0$, $r(x_0)=0$ such that $\forall x\in B(x_0, r): f(x)=f(x_0)+\alpha (x-x_0)+r(x)(x-x_0)$.
The definition is :

Let $D\subset \mathbb{C}$ and let $x_0\in D$ be an inner point of $D$, i.e. $D$ is a neighbourhood of $x_0$, i.e. there is $r>0$ with $B(x_0,r)\subset D$.
Let $f : D \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$.
$f$ is differentiable at $x_0$, if $\displaystyle{\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}}$ exists.
To show (i) to we define as $\alpha$ this limit? :unsure:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
To show (i) to we define as $\alpha$ this limit?
Hey mathmari!

That seems as a good approach yes. (Nod)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
That seems as a good approach yes. (Nod)

So the direction $\Rightarrow$ is :

Suppose that $f$ is differentiable at $x_0$. Then $\displaystyle{\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}}$ exists, i.e. there is $\alpha\in \mathbb{C}$ such that $\displaystyle{\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}=\alpha}$, i.e. $\forall \epsilon>0 \ \exists \delta>0\ \forall x\in B(x_0,\delta)$ such that $\left |\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}-\alpha\right |\leq \epsilon \Rightarrow \left |f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha (x-x_0)\right |\leq \epsilon |x-x_0|$.

So we have proven statement (i).

Could you give me a hint for (ii) ? :unsure:
 
mathmari said:
Could you give me a hint for (ii) ?
We have $f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)=r(x)(x-x_0)$ don't we? 🤔
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
We have $f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)=r(x)(x-x_0)$ don't we? 🤔

How do we get that $r(x)$ ? :unsure:
 
mathmari said:
How do we get that $r(x)$ ?
We define it.
Let $r(x)=\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)}{x-x_0}$ and $r(x_0)=0$ on $B(x_0,\delta)$.
Can we prove that $r$ is continuous?
What did continuous mean again? 🤔
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
We define it.
Let $r(x)=\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)}{x-x_0}$ and $r(x_0)=0$ on $B(x_0,\delta)$.
Can we prove that $r$ is continuous?
What did continuous mean again? 🤔

We have that $$\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}r(x)=\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)}{x-x_0}\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}=\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}-\alpha=\alpha-\alpha=0=r(x_0)$$ So $r$ is continuous at $x_0$. :unsure:

That means that we have proven in that way the statement (ii).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As for the other direction, do we have to show that from (i) the differentiability follows and from (ii) the differentiability follows also?

:unsure:
 
mathmari said:
As for the other direction, do we have to show that from (i) the differentiability follows and from (ii) the differentiability follows also?
Yep. 🤔
 
  • #10
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yep. 🤔

We suppose that (i) holds. Then $ |f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)|\leq \epsilon |x-x_0| \Rightarrow \left |\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)-\alpha(x-x_0)}{x-x_0}\right |\leq \epsilon \Rightarrow \left |\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}-\alpha\right |\leq \epsilon $.
This is the definition of $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}=\alpha$, which means that $f$ is differentiable in $x_0$.

We suppose that (ii) holds. Then $ f(x)=f(x_0)+\alpha (x-x_0)+r(x)(x-x_0) \Rightarrow \frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}=\alpha +r(x)$. Taking the limit we get $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}=\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}(\alpha +r(x))=\alpha$, which means that $f$ is differentiable in $x_0$. Is everything correct? :unsure:
 
  • #11
Looks correct to me. (Nod)
 
  • #12
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Looks correct to me. (Nod)

Great! Thank you very much! (Star)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K