Proving Discontinuity of f(x) = 1/(x^2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ccsun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discontinuity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) = 1/(x^2) is proven to be discontinuous at x = 0 using the epsilon-delta definition of limits. The analysis shows that for any proposed limit L, it is impossible to find a delta (δ) such that the condition |1/x^2 - L| < ε holds true for all ε > 0. Specifically, the argument demonstrates that no matter the choice of L, there exists an ε that cannot satisfy the limit condition, confirming that f(0) cannot be defined to make f(x) continuous at x = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Understanding of continuity in real analysis
  • Basic knowledge of limits and their properties
  • Familiarity with the function f(x) = 1/(x^2)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in detail
  • Learn about the properties of limits involving rational functions
  • Explore the implications of discontinuities in calculus
  • Investigate the Intermediate Value Theorem and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, particularly those studying real analysis, mathematicians interested in continuity and limits, and educators looking for examples of discontinuous functions.

ccsun
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that f(x) = 1/(x^2) is not continuous at x = 0 using the epsilon and delta definition of a limit


Homework Equations



definition of discontinuity
There exist epsilon > 0 such that for all delta > 0 there is an x such that |x-0| < delta but |1/(x^2)| >= Epsilon


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to go from here. Like how do i prove it? I don't understand!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Start by assuming that |x| &lt; \delta. Consider how this piece of information affects your function 1/x^2. Can you derive an \epsilon that is a function of delta such that |1/x^2| \geq \epsilon?
 


now, if 1/x2 IS continuous at 0,

\lim_{x \to 0} f(x) = f(0) which is a problem, because f(0) doesn't exist.

but let's go even further, let's prove that there isn't ANY real number we can pick for f(0) that will make 1/x2 continuous at 0.

now, for this limit L to exist, we need to be able to find a δ > 0, so that:

0 < |x| < δ implies |1/x2 - L| < ε.

can L be 0? choose ε = 1. that would mean that we could find δ > 0 so that 0 < |x| < δ implies |1/x2| < 1. here, we have another problem.

|1/x2| = (1/|x|)2, so if 0 < |x| < δ, (1/|x|)2 > δ2. so no δ less than 1 will work. but if we choose δ ≥ 1, then (0,1) is a subinterval of (0,δ), and for 0 < |x| < 1, |1/x2| > 1.

since for the particular ε = 1, we can't find a δ, L can't be 0. so L > 0 (since 1/x2) (if L < 0, then on the interval (0,1], 1/x2 would have to take on the value 0 (by the intermediate value theorem) but if x ≠ 0, 1/x2 > 0).

so what happens if δ < 1/(√(2L))?

then 0 < |x| < 1/(√(2L)) means that |1/x2 - L| ≥ |1/x2| - |L|

= 1/|x|2 - L > 1/(1/(√(2L))2) - L = 2L - L = L

now if we choose 0 < ε < L (which we can, since L > 0, for example ε = L/2 would work fine), we have the same problem as before, no δ < 1/(√(2L)) will work, and any larger choice for δ will lead to |x| < 1/(√(2L)) for some x as well (larger δ's don't help).

so there is always some ε > 0 that doesn't have a δ, no matter what we choose for L. so such an L doesn't exist, we cannot define f(0) to be any real number in such a way as to make f(x) = 1/x2 continuous.
 


Hello - where did the 1/sqrt(2L) come from? thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K