Proving distributivity of Dot/Cross product

  • Thread starter Thread starter IsaacA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the distributivity of the dot product and cross product using the definitions provided in equations 1.1 and 1.4. Specifically, it addresses the scenarios when three vectors are coplanar and in the general case. The dot product is defined as A · B = ABcosθ, while the cross product is defined as A × B = ABsinθN. Participants express confusion regarding the role of the third vector in the proof and the associative property of the cross product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically dot product and cross product.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, particularly cosine and sine.
  • Knowledge of vector geometry, including coplanarity and vector addition.
  • Basic grasp of mathematical proofs and their structure.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector operations, focusing on distributivity and associativity.
  • Explore geometric interpretations of the dot product and cross product.
  • Learn how to construct and interpret diagrams for vector proofs.
  • Investigate the implications of coplanarity in vector mathematics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physics, and engineering who are learning about vector operations and their properties, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts in their teaching.

IsaacA
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Using the definitions in equations 1.1 and 1.4, and appropriate diagrams, show that the dot product and cross product are distributive;
(a) when the three vectors are coplanar;
(b) in the general case.

Eq. 1.1) A dot B = ABcosθ

Eq. 1.4) A cross B = ABsinθN

This is exactly how my book puts the formulas.

I know how the definition of the dot product is derived, and that it's distributive over vector addition, but I don't understand why they're asking why the three vectors are coplanar. I don't see where the third vector comes into play. I haven't even tried solving this on the cross product side because I know if I don't conceptually grasp the dot product part of it the cross product will only frustrate me.

Here's my attempt at this proof:

Part A: Stared at it for a while trying to figure it out and eventually gave up.

Part B: Broke out the comfort food. Cried a little.

1.2 Is the cross product associative?

(Vector A cross Vector B) cross vector C (equals?) Vector A cross (Vector B cross Vector C)

I know the cross product isn't associate because the order of the cross product determines the direction of the resultant vector, but I feel like there's more to it.

Thank you all so much for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IsaacA said:
Using the definitions in equations 1.1 and 1.4, and appropriate diagrams, show that the dot product and cross product are distributive;
(a) when the three vectors are coplanar;
(b) in the general case.

Eq. 1.1) A dot B = ABcosθ

Eq. 1.4) A cross B = ABsinθN

This is exactly how my book puts the formulas.

I know how the definition of the dot product is derived, and that it's distributive over vector addition, but I don't understand why they're asking why the three vectors are coplanar. I don't see where the third vector comes into play. I haven't even tried solving this on the cross product side because I know if I don't conceptually grasp the dot product part of it the cross product will only frustrate me.

Here's my attempt at this proof:

Part A: Stared at it for a while trying to figure it out and eventually gave up.

Part B: Broke out the comfort food. Cried a little.

1.2 Is the cross product associative?

(Vector A cross Vector B) cross vector C (equals?) Vector A cross (Vector B cross Vector C)

I know the cross product isn't associate because the order of the cross product determines the direction of the resultant vector, but I feel like there's more to it.

Thank you all so much for your help!

The question is asking you to prove \vec{A}\cdot(\vec{B} + \vec{C}) = \vec{A}\cdot \vec{B} + \vec{A} \cdot \vec{C}, and the same type of result using \times instead of \cdot . So, of course there have to be three vectors involved.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K