Proving Ellipse When Viewing Circle with Non-Perpendicular Line of Sight

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter redoxes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the geometric transformation of a circle into an ellipse when viewed from a non-perpendicular line of sight. It establishes that this transformation can be proven using the definition of an ellipse as a conic section, specifically through the intersection of a plane and a circular cone. The use of Dandelin spheres is highlighted as a method for proving this relationship. Additionally, the conversation addresses common misconceptions about the appearance of the ellipse, clarifying that it does not resemble a chicken egg shape when viewed obliquely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conic sections and their properties
  • Familiarity with geometric transformations, specifically affine and projective transformations
  • Knowledge of Dandelin spheres and their role in geometry
  • Basic principles of perspective projection and parallel projection
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of conic sections in detail
  • Learn about affine transformations and their applications in geometry
  • Research Dandelin spheres and their significance in proving geometric theorems
  • Explore the differences between perspective projection and parallel projection in visual representation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, educators teaching conic sections, and anyone interested in the visual representation of geometric shapes.

redoxes
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Draw a circle in a paper, if the line of sight perpendular to the paper , we see a circle ,but if the line of sight is not perpendular to the paper, must we see an ellipse ? how to prove it ? how to find out the major axis or minor axis ? It seem that when we observe the circle ,it should be wide in near place and narrow in far place and should look like a chicken egg ,but it is not true ,how to explain the contradiction. When we view by eyes,we make an affine transformation or a projective transformation ? Whether the relation is true below : parallel projection = affine transformation, central projection = Perspective projection?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

redoxes said:
Draw a circle in a paper, if the line of sight perpendular to the paper , we see a circle ,but if the line of sight is not perpendular to the paper, must we see an ellipse ? how to prove it ? how to find out the major axis or minor axis ? It seem that when we observe the circle ,it should be wide in near place and narrow in far place and should look like a chicken egg ,but it is not true ,how to explain the contradiction.

Hi redoxes! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Proof that a circle viewed obliquely is an ellipse depends on how you define an ellipse.

The easiest way is to define it as a conic section, that is as the intersection of a plane and an upright circular cone …

then you can prove it using Dandelin spheres …

see the PF LIbrary on https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=98" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
32K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K