Proving Exponential Rules for [A,B]=c

  • Thread starter Thread starter Logarythmic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Rules
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identity exp[A+B]=exp[A]exp[B]exp[-c/2], where A and B are operators with a commutation relation [A,B]=c. Participants explore the implications of this relationship, particularly in the context of operator algebra and exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential for different proofs, including the use of a function f(x)=e^{Ax}e^{Bx} and the implications of the commutation relation. Questions arise about the treatment of operators and whether they can be treated as constants under differentiation.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to the proof, with some participants suggesting the use of differential equations and others considering series expansions. There is no explicit consensus on the best method, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the identity may hold under additional conditions, such as when [A,B] commutes with both A and B. There is also mention of the nature of c, indicating it does not have to be a complex number.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
Can someone give me a hint on how to prove that

exp[A+B]=exp[A]expexp[-c/2]

where A and B are two operators such that [A,B]=c, where c is a complex number.

This is not homework or something, I'm just curious when reading the rules.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Logarythmic,

the identity would also be true if [A,B] commutes with both A and B. c doesn't necessarily have to be a complex number in the first place.

A common proof starts with defining:

[tex]f(x)=e^{Ax}\,e^{Bx}[/tex]

Calculating [itex]\frac{df}{dx}[/itex] (*) will lead to a first-order differential equation. After finding the solution, f(1) will give the identity.

(*)hint: if [A,B] commutes with A and B then:

[tex]e^{-Bx}\,A\,e^{Bx}=A+x[A,B][/tex]

Regards,

nazzard
 
Thanks for your answer but I don't get it at all. When calculating the derivative of f(x), should I keep in mind that the operators could depend on x? If A and B commutes, then I could prove it just like with ordinary numbers, right? So suppose that A and B do not commute. Calculating df/dx and solving the differential equation just gives me the originally defined f(x)...? Isn't the easiest way to prove it by using the series expansion of e^A?
 
Treat the operators A and B as if they would not depend on x:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(e^{Ax}\,e^{Bx})=e^{Ax}\,A\,e^{Bx}+e^{Ax}\,e^{Bx}\,B[/tex]

[tex]=e^{Ax}\,e^{Bx}\,e^{-Bx}\,A\,e^{Bx}+e^{Ax}\,e^{Bx}\,B[/tex]

Now you can factor out f(x) and apply (*).
 
Last edited:
I solved it. Thanks. =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K