Proving f(0)=f(1) in the Sierpinski Topology with a Continuous Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted123
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In the Sierpinski topology on the set X = {0, 1}, a continuous function f: X → ℝ must satisfy f(0) = f(1). The discussion centers on proving this by assuming f(0) and f(1) are unequal, leading to a contradiction regarding the continuity of f. It is established that if the preimage of a closed set is not closed in X, then f cannot be continuous. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that for f to remain continuous, it must hold that f(0) equals f(1). The participants clarify misunderstandings about the definitions of open and closed sets in this context.
Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let X=\{0,1\} with the Sierpinski topology \tau = \{ \emptyset , \{0\} ,\{0,1\} \}.

Suppose f:X\to \mathbb{R} is continuous.

Show f(0)=f(1).

[Potentially useful observation: \{f(0)\} is closed in \mathbb{R}.]

The Attempt at a Solution



f:X\to\mathbb{R} is continuous \iff for every open (closed) set A\subseteq \mathbb{R},\;f^*(A) is open (closed) in X.

How to show f(0)=f(1)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose the contrary, and find an open set whose preimage is {1}.
 
Citan Uzuki said:
Suppose the contrary, and find an open set whose preimage is {1}.

Does f^*(\{0\}) = \{1\}?
 
Ted123 said:
Does f^*(\{0\}) = \{1\}?

Who could say until you define what f is?? Follow Citan Uzuki's advice and define f(0)=a and f(1)=b where a and b are unequal real numbers. Is f continuous?
 
Dick said:
Who could say until you define what f is?? Follow Citan Uzuki's advice and define f(0)=a and f(1)=b where a and b are unequal real numbers. Is f continuous?

So \{a\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} and \{b\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} are closed, and f^*(\{a\})=\{0\} \subseteq X is closed in X but f^*(\{a\})=\{1\} is not closed in X so f is not continuous - contradiction; therefore f(0)=f(1)?
 
Ted123 said:
So \{a\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} and \{b\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} are closed, and f^*(\{a\})=\{0\} \subseteq X is closed in X but f^*(\{a\})=\{1\} is not closed in X so f is not continuous - contradiction; therefore f(0)=f(1)?

^ That should say f^*(\{b\})=\{1\} but I can't find an edit button!
 
Ted123 said:
So \{a\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} and \{b\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} are closed, and f^*(\{a\})=\{0\} \subseteq X is closed in X but f^*(\{a\})=\{1\} is not closed in X so f is not continuous - contradiction; therefore f(0)=f(1)?

Right. Now to finish up show that if a=b then f IS continuous.
 
That approach will work, but you're doing it backwards. {0} is not closed in X, because its complement is {1}, which is not in the topology on X. So the conclusion that f is not continuous comes from the fact that f*({a}) = 0, not the fact that f*({b}) = 1.
 
Ted123 said:
^ That should say f^*(\{b\})=\{1\} but I can't find an edit button!

Yeah, actually I didn't notice, but you right. My 'Edit' button disappeared for a while yesterday. Seems to be back now. At least for me. Citan Uzuki is also right. I didn't notice you'd swapped the open and closed either. Guess I should read more carefully.
 
  • #10
Dick said:
Yeah, actually I didn't notice, but you right. My 'Edit' button disappeared for a while yesterday. Seems to be back now. At least for me. Citan Uzuki is also right. I didn't notice you'd swapped the open and closed either. Guess I should read more carefully.

If we have a contradiction after supposing a\neq b doesn't that mean we must have a=b?
 
  • #11
Ted123 said:
If we have a contradiction after supposing a\neq b doesn't that mean we must have a=b?

No! All you've shown is that if a not equal b is then f is not continuous. How can that be a proof that if a=b then f is continuous? There might not be ANY continuous functions.
 
  • #12
Dick said:
No! All you've shown is that if a not equal b is then f is not continuous. How can that be a proof that if a=b then f is continuous? There might not be ANY continuous functions.

But we're assuming all along that f:X\to \mathbb{R} is continuous (as the question tells us this!)
 
  • #13
Ted123 said:
But we're assuming all along that f:X\to \mathbb{R} is continuous (as the question tells us this!)

Ok, this is really not my day. You are right. I thought you had to prove f continuous iff a=b. I saw the double arrow in your original post and fixated on it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K