MHB Proving $f(2) \geq 27$ with Positive Coefficients

AI Thread Summary
To prove that $f(2) \geq 27$ for the polynomial $f(x) = x^3 + ax^2 + bx + 1$ with non-negative coefficients $a$ and $b$, and all roots being real, the analysis focuses on evaluating $f(2)$. Substituting $x = 2$ gives $f(2) = 8 + 4a + 2b + 1 = 9 + 4a + 2b$. The conditions on the roots imply that the polynomial's behavior is constrained, leading to the conclusion that the minimum value of $f(2)$ occurs when $a$ and $b$ are minimized. Ultimately, the derived inequality confirms that $f(2)$ indeed meets or exceeds 27 under the given constraints.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
given :$f(x)=x^3+ax^2+bx+1$ with $a\geq 0 \,\, and \,\, b\geq 0$ and also all of the three roots of $f(x)=0$ are real numbers,

prove $f(2)\geq 27$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
given :$f(x)=x^3+ax^2+bx+1$ with $a\geq 0 \,\, and \,\, b\geq 0$ and also all of the three roots of $f(x)=0$ are real numbers,

prove $f(2)\geq 27$
using Descartes' Rule of Signs all of the three roots of $f(x)=0---(1)$ must be negative
and let $-x_1,-x_2,-x_3$ be the solutions of $(1)$
(here $x_1,x_2,x_3>0$)
from Vieta's formulas and $AP\geq GP$ we have:
$x_1x_2x_3=1---(2)$
from $(2)$
$a=x_1+x_2+x_3\geq 3\sqrt[3]{x_1x_2x_3}=3---(3)\\
b=x_1x_2+x_1x_3+x_2x_3\geq 3\sqrt[3]{x_1^2x_2^2x_3^2}=3---(4)\\$
from $(3)(4):f(2)\geq 27=2^3+3\times 2^2+3\times 2+1=8+12+6+1$
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top