Proving F = grad(f) with 3 Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwxie
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In three-dimensional vector fields, the condition for a vector field F to be the gradient of a scalar field f is that the curl of F must be zero, expressed mathematically as ∇×F = 0. This results in three equations relating the partial derivatives of the components of F: ∂F_x/∂y - ∂F_y/∂x = 0, ∂F_x/∂z - ∂F_z/∂x = 0, and ∂F_z/∂y - ∂F_y/∂z = 0. The proof leverages Stokes's theorem and the property that the integral of a gradient vector field around a closed loop is always zero, allowing for the construction of a potential function f through integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically curl and gradient operations.
  • Familiarity with Stokes's theorem and its applications in vector fields.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their role in multivariable functions.
  • Basic concepts of scalar and vector fields in three-dimensional space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Stokes's theorem in proving properties of vector fields.
  • Explore examples of calculating curl for various vector fields in three dimensions.
  • Learn about potential functions and their relationship with gradient fields.
  • Investigate the implications of vector field integrals around closed loops.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are studying vector calculus and its applications in three-dimensional spaces.

jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For two variables, F = grad(f) if only if partial P / partial y is equal to partial Q / partial x
where, P and Q represent the x, y function, P(x,y) and Q(x,y)

For example:
F(x,y) = P(x,y) + Q(x,y)

Now the question is, for three variables, I have P + Q + R.
Is proving partial P / partial y = partial Q / partial x enough to say that F = grad(f)? If not, what is the approach to prove it for a 3 variables?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The condition for a vector field in three-space to be the gradient of some scalar field is a generalization of the condition in the plane: the vector field must have zero curl, [tex]\nabla\times\mathbf{F} = 0[/tex]. This works out to three equations, not one, between the partial derivatives of the components of [tex]\mathbf{F}[/tex]: [tex]\frac{\partial F_x}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial F_y}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial F_x}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial F_z}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial F_z}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial F_y}{\partial z} = 0[/tex].

The proof of this fact uses the same argument as in the plane case (a gradient vector field is one whose integral around a closed loop is always zero, so you can construct a potential function [tex]f[/tex] with [tex]\mathbf{F} = \nabla f[/tex] by integration) together with Stokes's theorem.
 
Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K