Proving f(x)=0 by Least Upper Bound on [a,b]

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andilus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Upper bound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a continuous function f on the interval [a,b], where f(a) < 0 and f(b) > 0, has a largest x in [a,b] such that f(x) = 0. The participants explore the use of the least upper bound (lub) in their reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the least upper bound to show the existence of a largest x in [a,b] where f(x) = 0.
  • Another participant suggests looking into the Intermediate Value Theorem or Bolzano's Theorem as relevant concepts.
  • A third participant agrees with the use of the Intermediate Value Theorem, stating it guarantees the existence of an x in [a,b] such that f(x) = 0, and outlines the necessary conditions to prove that z, defined as the lub of the set of x where f(x) = 0, satisfies the required properties.
  • A later reply expresses frustration about the thread being a duplicate of a previous discussion, indicating that similar questions have already been addressed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof method, as some focus on the least upper bound approach while others reference established theorems. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific proof technique to be used.

Contextual Notes

There are references to the Intermediate Value Theorem and the conditions necessary for the proof, but the discussion does not clarify the assumptions or definitions that underpin these concepts.

andilus
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
if f is continuous on [a,b] with f(a)<0<f(b), show that there is a largest x in [a,b] with f(x)=0

i think it can be done by least upper bounds, but i dun know wat is the exact prove.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look up "Intermediate Value Theorem" or "Bolzano's Theorem."
 
As another poster suggested, the intermediate value theorem guarantees there is an x in [a,b] where f(x) = 0. And your idea of using the lub is a good one. So let

z = lub \{ x \in [a,b] | f(x) = 0\}

So what you need to show to finish the problem is:

1. z is in [a,b]
2. f(z) = 0
3. No value x > z in [a,b] satisfies f(x) = 0.
 
Last edited:
I now see that this is a duplicate of an identical thread in the Calculus & Beyond section. Please don't do that. It wastes our time answering questions that have already been answered elsewhere.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K