Proving Fermion Occupation with Commutation Relations

  • Thread starter Thread starter commutator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermion
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the number operator for fermions yields eigenvalues of 0 and 1, while for bosons, it can yield any non-negative integer. The participant initially struggles with the concept, mistakenly thinking that the number operator could yield higher values for fermions. They clarify that the proof pertains specifically to the occupation of a single state, where the application of anticommutation relations leads to the conclusion that the eigenvalue must be either 0 or 1. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between the total number of particles and the occupancy of a single quantum state. Ultimately, the participant acknowledges their misunderstanding and gains clarity on the topic.
commutator
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

prove , using appropriate commutation relations that the number operator yields the values 0 and 1 for fermions , and any non - negative values for bosons.



Homework Equations

the commutation relations for bosons and fermions.



The Attempt at a Solution

the boson case is solved.
the fermions-i can understand this thing intuitively ,because on applying the number operator on a state containing n fermions in a single state , and then using commutation relation i am getting (-n) as eigenvalue which is absurd. but i do not know how to give a more compact proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is not precisely stated. The number operator for fermions can as well have eigenvalue 100 - can't you have 100 of electrons? Of course you can. Probably what you mean is the number of fermions in a given state. In that case you indeed use anticommutation relations, but you end up with the eigenstate being equal to its minus, not with the eigenvalue equal to its minus!
 
yes. i meant single state.
i have understood my mistake. thanks.
 
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K