Proving Feynman Slash Identity: 2a\cdot b

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feynman Identity
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 11K views
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


I am trying to prove that [tex]\displaystyle{\not} a \displaystyle{\not} b + \displaystyle{\not} b \displaystyle{\not} a = 2a\cdot b[/tex] using the relation [tex]\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\} = 2g^{\mu\nu}[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If I work backwards,
[tex] 2a\cdot b = 2a_{\mu} g^{\mu \nu} b_{\nu}<br /> = a_{\mu}(\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu})b_{\nu} + a_{\mu}(\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\mu})b_{\nu}[/tex]

The first term is [tex]\displaystyle{\not} a \displaystyle{\not} b[/tex] but the second term doesn't seem to look like [tex]\displaystyle{\not} b \displaystyle{\not} a[/tex]. Am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're missing the fact that [itex]a_\mu[/itex] and [itex]b_\nu[/itex] are ordinary numbers, and so commute with everything.