Undergrad Proving the Continuity of Fourier Transform in the Limit as L Tends to Infinity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity of the Fourier Transform as the limit of L approaches infinity. Participants clarify that the Fourier Transform serves as a generalization of the complex Fourier series, transitioning from discrete sums to continuous integrals. The key transformation involves replacing A(n) with F(k)dk, which is justified as L tends to infinity. The rigorous proof of this transformation is essential for understanding the underlying principles of Fourier analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of integrals and their applications in analysis
  • Basic grasp of complex numbers and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Fourier Transform in detail
  • Learn about the convergence of Fourier series
  • Explore the relationship between discrete and continuous functions in analysis
  • Review rigorous proofs in mathematical analysis, particularly in Fourier analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of Fourier analysis will benefit from this discussion.

henry wang
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
fourierSeries.png

Quote: "The Fourier transform is a generalization of the complexFourier series in the limit as [PLAIN]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/FourierTransform/Inline1.gif. Replace the discrete http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/FourierTransform/Inline2.gif with the continuous
Inline3.gif
while letting [PLAIN]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/FourierTransform/Inline4.gif. Then change the sum to an integral, and the equations become
Inline5.gif
Inline6.gif
Inline7.gif

(1)
Inline8.gif
Inline9.gif
Inline10.gif

"
From: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransform.html
Why can we replace A(n) with F(k)dk as L tends to infinity? I know that A(n) will be continues as L tends to infinity, but I can't make sense of F(K)dk.
Can I just let A(n)=F(k)dk or can I proof this from the definition of Fourier series rigorously?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thx I solved it.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K