Proving g°f is Onto: Showing the Ontoness of Composed Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To prove that the composition of two onto functions, g°f, is also onto, one must establish that for every z in Z, there exists an x in X such that g(f(x)) = z. Given that f:X→Y and g:Y→Z are both onto, for every y in Y, there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, and for every z in Z, there exists a y in Y such that g(y) = z. Therefore, the composition g°f must also be onto, as there cannot exist a z in Z without a corresponding x in X.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of onto functions and their definitions
  • Familiarity with function composition
  • Basic knowledge of set theory and mappings
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of onto functions in more detail
  • Learn about function composition and its implications
  • Explore examples of proofs involving onto functions
  • Investigate related concepts such as one-to-one functions and bijections
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying abstract algebra or real analysis, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to function properties and proofs.

charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f and g are both onto show g°f is onto.

f:X→Y and g:Y→Z



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Since f is onto then there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, for all y in Y.

Since g is onto then there exists a y in Y such that g(y) =z for all z in Z.

Hence, if g°f is not onto then there exists a z in Z such that there is no corresponding x in X. But since g and f are onto this is not possible. Therefore, g°f is onto.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your basic idea is correct. However, I would be careful with how exactly you write this out. Your first statement, "Since f is onto then there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, for all y in Y" is not quite correct. The way you have it arranged, it reads as if there is one specific x in X that maps to all values of y in Y.

Of course this is not what you mean, but if you're starting out with proofs (which I'm assuming you are) then it is good to be precise at first. "For a given y in Y, there exists some x in X such that f(x) = y."

Hope that helps!
 
zooxanthellae said:
Your basic idea is correct. However, I would be careful with how exactly you write this out. Your first statement, "Since f is onto then there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, for all y in Y" is not quite correct. The way you have it arranged, it reads as if there is one specific x in X that maps to all values of y in Y.

Of course this is not what you mean, but if you're starting out with proofs (which I'm assuming you are) then it is good to be precise at first. "For a given y in Y, there exists some x in X such that f(x) = y."

Hope that helps!

Ok thanks that makes a lot more sense, noted!
 
Just pick an arbitrary z ∊ Z . It's pretty straight forward to show that there is some x ∊ X , such that g(f(x)) = z .
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K