Proving g(x) is continuous over interval (-∞,-2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Interval
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation for expressing the continuity of the function g(x) over the interval (-∞, -2). Participants clarify that the notation "−∞ < a < −2" is equivalent to "a ∈ (-∞, -2)" and that including "For" in the expression is unnecessary. The consensus is that using "−∞ < a" does not provide additional information, as "a" is inherently a number and cannot equal negative infinity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using proper mathematical notation to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical notation and intervals
  • Familiarity with concepts of continuity in functions
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities
  • Experience with interval notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of continuous functions in calculus
  • Study the differences between interval notation and inequality notation
  • Learn about the implications of including endpoints in interval notation
  • Explore common mathematical notations used in textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding proper mathematical notation and its implications in calculus and analysis.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For number 18,
1676597607436.png

The solution is,
1676597636101.png

However, should they not write "For ## -∞ < a < -2##" since ##a ≠ -∞## (infinity is not a number)?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##a## is a number, so can't be negative infinity.

In particular, ##a\in [-\infty,-2)## isn't really a meaningful thing outside of people abusing notation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Office_Shredder said:
##a## is a number, so can't be negative infinity.

In particular, ##a\in [-\infty,-2)## isn't really a meaningful thing outside of people abusing notation.
Thank you for your reply @Office_Shredder !

So a better notation than ## a < -2 ## is ## -∞ < a < -2##, correct?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you for your reply @Office_Shredder !

So a better notation than ## a < -2 ## is ## -∞ < a < -2##, correct?

Many thanks!
No, the ##-\infty<a## notation conveys no additional information. ##a## and ##a>-\infty## are the same thing. You can include the negative infinity, but in no sense is it better here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Callumnc1 said:
However, should they not write "For −∞<a<−2"
##-\infty < a < -2## and ##a \in (-\infty, -2)## are two different notations that say exactly the same thing. In most of the books I've seen, interval notation, as in the 2nd example above, uses a parenthesis to indicate an endpoint that isn't included, and a bracket to indicate that an endpoint is included. I've seen other notations used, but these seem to be a lot rarer.

Also, I don't think any textbook would include "For" in a compound inequality. ##-\infty < a < -2## says everything that needs to be said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K