- #1

- 30

- 0

Can someone explain to me please.

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/2.-partial-derivatives/part-b-chain-rule-gradient-and-directional-derivatives/session-36-proof/MIT18_02SC_notes_19.pdf

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter henry wang
- Start date

- #1

- 30

- 0

Can someone explain to me please.

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/2.-partial-derivatives/part-b-chain-rule-gradient-and-directional-derivatives/session-36-proof/MIT18_02SC_notes_19.pdf

- #2

- 8,938

- 2,926

Can someone explain to me please.

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/2.-partial-derivatives/part-b-chain-rule-gradient-and-directional-derivatives/session-36-proof/MIT18_02SC_notes_19.pdf

If you have a function [itex]f(x,y,z)[/itex], and you have a constant [itex]c[/itex], then the set of points satisfying [itex]f(x,y,z) = c[/itex] is a two-dimensional surface. So now we let [itex]\vec{r}(t)[/itex] be any path that stays on that surface. In terms of components, if we write [itex]\vec{r}(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t))[/itex], then to say that [itex]\vec{r}(t)[/itex] stays on the surface [itex]f(x,y,z)=c[/itex] just means that for all [itex]t[/itex], we have:

[itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = c[/itex]

So far, this is just true by assumption. We're assuming that [itex]x(t), y(t), z(t)[/itex] are three functions such that [itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = c[/itex].

Since [itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = c[/itex], then it immediately follows that:

[itex]\frac{d}{dt} f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = \frac{dc}{dt} = 0[/itex]

All they're doing is defining [itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = g(t)[/itex]. That's just the definition of [itex]g[/itex]. So it immediately follows that [itex]\frac{d}{dt} g(t) = 0[/itex].

- #3

- 30

- 0

Thank you very much, that make a lot of sense, I understand now!If you have a function [itex]f(x,y,z)[/itex], and you have a constant [itex]c[/itex], then the set of points satisfying [itex]f(x,y,z) = c[/itex] is a two-dimensional surface. So now we let [itex]\vec{r}(t)[/itex] be any path that stays on that surface. In terms of components, if we write [itex]\vec{r}(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t))[/itex], then to say that [itex]\vec{r}(t)[/itex] stays on the surface [itex]f(x,y,z)=c[/itex] just means that for all [itex]t[/itex], we have:

[itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = c[/itex]

So far, this is just true by assumption. We're assuming that [itex]x(t), y(t), z(t)[/itex] are three functions such that [itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = c[/itex].

Since [itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = c[/itex], then it immediately follows that:

[itex]\frac{d}{dt} f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = \frac{dc}{dt} = 0[/itex]

All they're doing is defining [itex]f(x(t), y(t), z(t)) = g(t)[/itex]. That's just the definition of [itex]g[/itex]. So it immediately follows that [itex]\frac{d}{dt} g(t) = 0[/itex].

Share:

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 624

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 669

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 919

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 895

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 867

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 720

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 983

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 357

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 1K