PROVING INTERSECTION OF Any number of COMPACT SETS is COMPACT?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 16K views
PhysicsHelp12
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck ...
Ive proved the intersection of any number of closed sets is closed ...
and Let S = { A_a : a Element of I } be an collection of compact sets...then
by heine Borel Theorem ...Each A_a in S is closed...so this part is done now I just
have to show the intersection is bounded...
so I said since each A_a in S is bounded by Heine Borel ..then A_a is a subset of [a,b]
and then this is when I am really stuck:
Let B={[a,b] : There exists an A_a in S such that A_a subset of [a,b]}

I took the intersection of both sides of the subset ...and said Intersection S is a subset of
Intersection of [a,b] so Intersection of S is bounded and therefore compact

but somehow I think this is an error ..I don't know how to do this formally

Please help
 
on Phys.org
Are you talking about sets or real numbers? Or, more generally, in Rn?

It is true that in any metric topology, a compact set is both closed and bounded.

It is NOT true that in any metric topology, closed and bounded sets are compact.
For example, the Heine-Borel theorem is not true of the rational numbers with d(x,y)= |x-y|.

If you are working in the real numbers, then morphism is giving you a good hint: if A is a bounded set the A intersect ANY other sets is bounded.

If you are working in any topological space, the theorem is still true. You would need to look at the basic definition of "compact" because without a metric, "bounded" is not even defined: let {U} be an open cover for A and show it has a finite subcover.
 
this seems to be false, unless by compact you mean the bourbaki definition of compact which includes hausdorff as part of the definition. if that is what you mean by compact then a compact set is also closed. so since a closed subset of a compact set is compact you get it easily. but the disjoint union of two closed unit discs, then identified except at the origin seems to be a space in which both discs are compact but their intersection is not, being a punctured disc.