Proving inverse of a 2 x 2 matrix is really an inverse

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formula for the inverse of a 2 x 2 matrix, specifically the expression $$\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix}d&-b\\-c&a\end{pmatrix} \cdot (ad-bc)^{-1}$$. Participants clarify that the terms ##ad - bc## and ##-cb + da## are not equal to 1; rather, they are both divided by ##ad - bc## to yield 1. The procedure for calculating the inverse is emphasized as straightforward and useful for solving linear equations in two variables, as demonstrated through specific examples.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically 2 x 2 matrices
  • Familiarity with determinants in linear algebra
  • Basic knowledge of linear equations and systems
  • Proficiency in matrix multiplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in linear algebra
  • Learn about matrix inversion techniques for larger matrices
  • Explore applications of 2 x 2 matrix inverses in solving linear systems
  • Investigate algorithms for matrix operations in programming languages like Python or MATLAB
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in solving systems of linear equations using matrix methods.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1682211587003.png

Dose someone please know how ##ad - bc## and ##-cb + da## are equal to 1?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not equal to 1. They are both divided by ad-bc, which gives 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and member 731016
FactChecker said:
They are not equal to 1. They are both divided by ad-bc, which gives 1.
Oh thank you @FactChecker ! I see now
 
This formula
$$
\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix}d&-b\\-c&a\end{pmatrix} \cdot (ad-bc)^{-1}
$$

is so easy to memorize ...
  1. swap the diagonal entries ##a \leftrightarrow d##
  2. put a minus sign in front of the entries on the side diagonal ##b \rightarrow -b\, , \,c\rightarrow -c##
  3. and finally, divide by the determinant ##ad-bc.##
... that I use it whenever I have to solve a linear equation system in ##2## variables.

E.g. I wanted to write ##16 \cdot 24 ## and ##8\cdot 48## as ##(n-m)\cdot (n+m)## today. That goes:
\begin{align*}
\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\1&1 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}n\\m\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}16\\24 \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
Then by doing the procedure as described I get
\begin{align*}
\begin{pmatrix}n\\m \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}16\\24 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \underbrace{(1\cdot 1- (-1\cdot 1))^{-1}}_{=1/2}=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}8\\12 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}8+12\\ -8+12\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}20\\4 \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
Same with the other product ##8\cdot 48.##

I know this was an easy example and could probably just "be seen". But I'm better with algorithms than "seeing" things. Once you get used to that procedure it is really easy to follow. Especially if the examples are a bit more complicated.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K