Proving inverse of a 2 x 2 matrix is really an inverse

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the properties of the inverse of a 2 x 2 matrix, specifically the relationship between the determinant and the elements of the matrix. Participants are exploring the formula for the inverse and its application in solving linear equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the equality of certain expressions related to the determinant of a 2 x 2 matrix. Some participants clarify that the expressions are not equal to 1 but rather are divided by the determinant, leading to a value of 1. Others share their experiences with memorizing the formula for the inverse and applying it to solve linear equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some clarifications provided regarding the determinant and its role in the inverse calculation. There is a mix of exploration of the formula and personal anecdotes about its application, indicating a productive discussion without explicit consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention their preference for algorithmic approaches over intuitive understanding, highlighting different learning styles in the context of matrix operations.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1682211587003.png

Dose someone please know how ##ad - bc## and ##-cb + da## are equal to 1?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not equal to 1. They are both divided by ad-bc, which gives 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and member 731016
FactChecker said:
They are not equal to 1. They are both divided by ad-bc, which gives 1.
Oh thank you @FactChecker ! I see now
 
This formula
$$
\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix}d&-b\\-c&a\end{pmatrix} \cdot (ad-bc)^{-1}
$$

is so easy to memorize ...
  1. swap the diagonal entries ##a \leftrightarrow d##
  2. put a minus sign in front of the entries on the side diagonal ##b \rightarrow -b\, , \,c\rightarrow -c##
  3. and finally, divide by the determinant ##ad-bc.##
... that I use it whenever I have to solve a linear equation system in ##2## variables.

E.g. I wanted to write ##16 \cdot 24 ## and ##8\cdot 48## as ##(n-m)\cdot (n+m)## today. That goes:
\begin{align*}
\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\1&1 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}n\\m\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}16\\24 \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
Then by doing the procedure as described I get
\begin{align*}
\begin{pmatrix}n\\m \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}16\\24 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \underbrace{(1\cdot 1- (-1\cdot 1))^{-1}}_{=1/2}=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix}\cdot \begin{pmatrix}8\\12 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}8+12\\ -8+12\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}20\\4 \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
Same with the other product ##8\cdot 48.##

I know this was an easy example and could probably just "be seen". But I'm better with algorithms than "seeing" things. Once you get used to that procedure it is really easy to follow. Especially if the examples are a bit more complicated.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K