Proving Inverse Tangent Identity: x = 1/2, y = 1/3 vs. x = 2, y = 3

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identity \(\arctan{x} + \arctan{y} = \arctan{\frac{x+y}{1-xy}}\) for specific values of \(x\) and \(y\). Participants are examining the validity of this identity when \(x = \frac{1}{2}\), \(y = \frac{1}{3}\) versus when \(x = 2\), \(y = 3\).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the tangent addition formula to evaluate the identity. Some express confusion about the results when substituting values, questioning whether the identity holds for both sets of values. Others suggest simply plugging in the values to check the validity.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the identity's validity for the given values. Some participants assert that the equation does not hold for \(x = 2\) and \(y = 3\), while others are questioning the implications of their findings and whether alternative interpretations of the identity might exist.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the left-hand side of the identity is undefined if \(xy = 1\) and discuss conditions under which the identity might hold, raising questions about the ranges of \(x\) and \(y\) that affect the identity's validity.

m00c0w
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Show that [tex]\arctan{x} + \arctan {y} = \arctan { \frac{x+y}{1-xy} }[/tex] when [tex]x = \frac{1}{2}\ and \y = \frac{1}{3}[/tex] but not when [tex]x = 2\ and \y = 3[/tex]

I've tried taking the tangent of both sides but I don't know what to do then when I've got [tex]\tan ( \arctan{x} + \arctan{y} ) = \frac{x+y}{1-xy}[/tex]

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that [tex]\tan(u+v) = \frac{\tan u + \tan v}{1-\tan u \tan v}[/tex]
 
I don't see what the difficulty is. You are aske to show that this equation is satisfied when [itex]x= \frac{1}{2}[/itex] and [itex]y= \frac{1}{3}[/itex] but not when x= 2 and y= 3.

Okay, plug those values in and evaluate. Courtrigrax's method would appear to be a general method of proving that it is an identity: true for all x and y which contradicts the problem!
 
I'm not clear what the problem is. You are asked to show that this equation is satisfied when [itex]x= \frac{1}{2}[/itex] and [itex]y= \frac{1}{3}[/itex] but not when x= 2 and y= 3.

Okay, plug those values in and evaluate.

Courtrigrax's method would appear to be a general method of proving that it is an identity: true for all x and y, which contradicts the statement of the problem!
 
Ok, so I used the identity [tex]\tan(u+v) = \frac{\tan u + \tan v}{1-\tan u \tan v}[/tex] but all it does is bring me to the equation [tex]\frac{x+y}{1-xy} = \frac{x+y}{1-xy}[/tex]. I had tried substituting the values in before and found that the statement held true for both sets of x and y, but I assumed I must have done something wrong. I told my teacher and she said I was wrong :confused:

So have I messed up? Or does the equation hold true for x = 2 and y = 3 thus rendering the proof impossible?
 
The equation does not hold for x = 2 and y = 3. Just plug in the values. Also, can you see that it will work for [tex]x > -1[/tex] , [tex]y < 1[/tex]? Why is this?

It is because the left hand side is not defined if [tex]xy = 1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
courtrigrad said:
The equation does not hold for x = 2 and y = 3. Just plug in the values. Also, can you see that it will work for [tex]x > -1[/tex] , [tex]y < 1[/tex]? Why is this?

It is because the left hand side is not defined if [tex]xy = 1[/tex]

I plugged in the values and got the following...

[tex]\arctan {2}\ + \arctan {3} = \arctan {-1}[/tex]
[tex]2.35619... = -0.78539...[/tex]

However another solution to [tex]\arctan {-1}[/tex] is [tex]-0.78539... + pi = 2.35619...[/tex] which makes the statement hold true :confused: Am I not allowed to take anything other than the principal value? If so, why not?

Also, you said that [tex]x > -1[/tex], [tex]y < 1[/tex]. Are you saying that these are the only values of x and y that the equation will hold for? That doesn't seem to make sense, as if, for example, I use x = -5 and y = 10 the equation will still hold true.
 
Last edited:
tangent(x) has a discontinuity at [itex]\pi/2[/itex] or approximately 1.57.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K