Proving K|n!+k for n≥2, k=2,3,4,...,n by Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonroberts74
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that \( k \) divides \( n! + k \) for all integers \( n \ge 2 \) and \( k = 2, 3, 4, \ldots, n \). Participants explore the implications of \( k \) and \( n \) changing simultaneously and question the relationship between the two variables.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of \( k \) taking values from 2 to \( n \) and whether \( k \) and \( n \) can be equal. They explore examples to clarify the conditions of the problem. Some participants suggest that if \( k < n \), then \( k \) divides \( n! \), while others question the necessity of breaking down the proof into cases.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications. Some have pointed out that the problem may not require an induction proof, which contrasts with previous problems in the set. There is acknowledgment of the simplicity of the proof once the relationship between \( k \) and \( n \) is understood.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is distinct from others they have encountered, particularly regarding the simultaneous variation of \( n \) and \( k \). There is also mention of a confirmation from a professor that this problem does not require induction, which has influenced the direction of the discussion.

jonroberts74
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove by induction that K|n!+k for all integers [tex]n \ge 2[/tex] and k = 2,3,4,...,n
this one is different than other proofs I have had because I've only dealt with n changing but now n and k change.

k goes up to n, does this mean k and n have the same values?

for instance,

P(2)

[tex]2|2! + 2 \Rightarrow 2|4[/tex]

so p(k)

is [tex]k|n!+k; n=k[/tex]

[tex]k|k!+k[/tex]

??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jonroberts74 said:

Homework Statement



prove by induction that K|n!+k for all integers [tex]n \ge 2[/tex] and k = 2,3,4,...,n



this one is different than other proofs I have had because I've only dealt with n changing but now n and k change.

k goes up to n, does this mean k and n have the same values?

for instance,

P(2)

[tex]2|2! + 2 \Rightarrow 2|4[/tex]

so p(k)

is [tex]k|n!+k; n=k[/tex] ??

You ask: "does this mean k and n have the same values?". No, that is not what it says and not what it means. Look at some small-n examples. If n = 3 it says that 2|3!+2 and 3|3!+3. So, k is not 3; it is any number in the set {2,3}. If n = 4 it says that all three of the statements 2|4!+2, 3|4!+3 and 4|4!+4 are true.
 
ah okay

whatever n is, then k takes on each value in the set {2,...,n}
 
The fact that if k< n the n k divides n! makes this pretty close to trivial.
 
[tex]2|n!+2[/tex]
[tex]3|n!+3[/tex]
[tex]4|n!+4[/tex]
[tex]\downarrow[/tex]
[tex]k|n!+k[/tex]

where k takes on the values of 2,3,4...n and n is an integer greater than or equal to 2

and because for all k<n, k|n and when n=k, k|n

so my p(k) is

[tex]k|n!+k[/tex]

and

p(k+1)

[tex](k+1)|n!+(k+1)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
I have to make a correction. its not asking for induction. all the other problems on this problem set were induction but I confirmed with my prof this is not an induction proof question
 
Can you see a common factor in the numerator?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
k is a factor of k, clearly and k is a also a factor of n! by the given information


[tex]2 \le k \le n[/tex] and by definition of a factorial k had to be used somewhere along the product

[tex]\prod_{k=2}^{n} k[/tex]

case 1

k = 2, n > or equal 2

[tex]\frac{2*...*n + 2}{2}[/tex]

case 2

2 < k <n

[tex]\frac{2*...*k*...*n + k}{k}[/tex]

case 3

n=k

[tex]\frac{2*...*k + k}{k}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Those case are not necessary. WWDG's point is that if [itex]k\le n[/itex] then k is a factor of n!.
 
  • #10
I understand that but I am expected to show a proof. Seems a tad bit too easy to say if

[tex]k \le n[/tex] then k is a factor of n!
 
  • #11
jonroberts74 said:
I understand that but I am expected to show a proof. Seems a tad bit too easy to say if

[tex]k \le n[/tex] then k is a factor of n!

But that is absolutely correct, so IS a proof! Sometimes proofs are easy---after you "see" them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K