Proving Lie Group \rho Preserves Inner Product/Cross Product

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Lie groups
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Lie group automorphism \(\rho : \mathbb{H} \to \mathbb{H}; q \mapsto u^{-1}q u\), where \(u\) is a unit quaternion. Participants aim to demonstrate that \(\rho\) preserves the inner product and cross product within the subspace of purely imaginary quaternions, \(\mathbf{i}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{j}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{k}\mathbb{R}\). A proposed method involves expanding the expression \(u^{-1}qu\) and calculating the resulting terms, although concerns arise regarding the complexity of this approach. The preservation of angles and orientation through rotation is acknowledged as a valid proof method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quaternion algebra and properties
  • Familiarity with Lie groups and automorphisms
  • Knowledge of inner product and cross product definitions in vector spaces
  • Experience with complex algebraic expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study quaternion algebra and its applications in 3D rotations
  • Learn about the properties of Lie groups and their automorphisms
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of inner and cross products in \(\mathbb{R}^3\)
  • Investigate simplification techniques for complex algebraic expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and computer scientists interested in quaternionic analysis, Lie group theory, and geometric transformations.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Let \rho : \mathbb{H} \to \mathbb{H}; q \mapsto u^{-1}q u
where u is any unit quaternion. Then \rho is a continuous automorphism of H.

I'm asked to show that \rho preserves the inner product and cross product on the subspace \mathbf{i}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{j}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{k}\mathbb{R} consisting of purely imaginary quaternions.

The only thing I can think of is that \rho acts on \mathbf{i}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{j}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{k}\mathbb{R} by rotating that subspace (for which I know a proof), and rotations preserve angles and orientation.

Is there a more direct method which avoids using the fact that \rho rotates \mathbf{i}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{j}\mathbb{R} + \mathbf{k}\mathbb{R} ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The obvious method would be to apply the inner product and cross product to u^{-1}qu and show that you get the same thing.
 
Hi HallsofIvy,

I tried that but there are 4 x 3 x 4 =48 terms when we come to calculate e.g.

u^{-1}q u = \bar{u} q u = (u_0 - u_1i-u_2j-u_2k)(p_1 i + p_2j+p_3k)(u_0 + u_1i+u_2j+u_2k). Is it really necessary to expand this whole thing out and then take the dot product with another one?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K