Proving limit of multivariable function exists

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the limit of a multivariable function as (x,y) approaches (0,0) for the expression (x^(1/3)*y^2) / (x+y^3). Participants are exploring whether the limit exists or does not exist based on different paths of approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various paths to approach the limit, including x = y^3 and y = x, leading to different limit values. Some question the validity of their findings and the reliability of external tools like WolframAlpha.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning the implications of different limit values obtained from various paths. There is recognition that differing results suggest the limit may not exist, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of their findings and the accuracy of computational tools. There is also mention of the delta-epsilon method, indicating a formal approach to proving limits.

Anakin_k
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate or show that the limit DNE.

Limit as (x,y) -> (0,0) of (x^1/3)*y^2 / x+y^3.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried approaching from multiple paths, and it seems that the limit is equal to 0. I used the delta-epsilon method to prove the limit but I've been stuck so far.

Any ideas on how to begin?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Approaching from the limit x = y^3, we get

lim = y^3/ 2(y^3)
(x,y) -> (0,0)
= 1/2

Since the value of the limit from the path x = y^3 is not equal to 0 (the value that you have been getting), then the limit does not exist
 
leej72 said:
Approaching from the limit x = y^3, we get

lim = y^3/ 2(y^3)
(x,y) -> (0,0)
= 1/2

Since the value of the limit from the path x = y^3 is not equal to 0 (the value that you have been getting), then the limit does not exist

When I said approaching from the limit x = y^3, I meant from the path.
 
Hi,

If we are approaching from the path x = y^3, then

lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of (x^1/3)*y^2 / x+y^3

= lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of (y)*y^2 / y^3+y^3 =

= lim(x,y) -> (0,0) of y^3 / 2y^3. = 1/2

That seems to make sense.

However, if we use the path y=x:
lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of (x^1/3)*y^2 / x+y^3
= lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of x^(7/3) / (x+x^3)
= 0

And then WolframAlpha says 0 too. Why is that?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=limit+%28x%2Cy%29+-%3E+%280%2C0%29+of+%28x^1%2F3%29*y^2+%2F+%28x%2By^3%29
 
Last edited:
Anakin_k said:
Hi,

If we are approaching from the path x = y^3, then

lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of (x^1/3)*y^2 / x+y^3

= lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of (y)*y^2 / y^3+y^3 =

= lim(x,y) -> (0,0) of y^3 / 2y^3. = 1/2

That seems to make sense.

But then why does WolframAlpha say otherwise?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=limit+%28x%2Cy%29+-%3E+%280%2C0%29+of+%28x^1%2F3%29*y^2+%2F+%28x%2By^3%29

It's not always clear why WA reaches the conclusions it does. What do you conclude about WA?
 
Dick said:
It's not always clear why WA reaches the conclusions it does. What do you conclude about WA?

I updated my post above, to show that I did try some other paths too.

So if both limits are different, then it would mean that the limit does not exist.

I guess that WA isn't perfect after all. :)
 
Anakin_k said:
I updated my post above, to show that I did try some other paths too.

So if both limits are different, then it would mean that the limit does not exist.

I guess that WA isn't perfect after all. :)

I agree. Not the first mistake I've seen it make either.
 
Well thanks for clarifying that up you guys.

I have one more similar question with which I need some help. I've gotten a bit further with this one but not enough:

I concluded that the limit equals 0 by trying a few paths (hopefully this time it was right):

\lim_{\{x,y\}\to \{1,0\}} \, \frac{(x-1)^2 \ln (x)}{(x-1)^2+y^2}If 0<\left\|(x-1)^2+y^2\right\|<\delta,

then \left|g(x,y) - 0\right|<\epsilon
\left|g(x,y)\right| = \left|\frac{(x-1)^2 \ln (x)}{(x-1)^2+y^2}\right|= \left|\frac{(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2+y^2}\right|\left|\ln[x]\right| \leq \left|\frac{(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2}\right| \left|\ln[x]\right| = \left| \ln[x] \right|

What would be a good choice for \delta so that \ln[x] < \epsilon? Plus, it seems like the way that I've worked it out so far makes the IF statement unhelpful to the process.
 
You might conclude it but just trying "a few" paths does not prove you will always get 0 along any path. However, in this case the numerator depends only on x so it is easy to see that the fraction approaches 0 as x goes to 1, no matter what y is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K