Proving Linear Dependence in a Set of Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahamdiheme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearly
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
ahamdiheme
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose v_1,...,v_k is a linearly dependent set. Then show that one of the vectors must be a linear combination of the others.

Homework Equations



.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attached an attempt at the problem. Thank you for help
 

Attachments

  • Question.jpg
    Question.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 388
  • solution.jpg
    solution.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 418
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution says [itex]a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n= 0[/itex] and then you go to [itex]v_1= (-1/a_1)(a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n)[/itex]

That's pretty good. The only problem is you don't know that a1 is not 0! If it is you can't solve for v1. What you DO know, from the definition of "dependent", that you didn't say is that at least one of the "ai" is NOT 0. You don't know which one but you can always say "Let "k" be such that ak is not 0". Then what?
 
Thank you. What if i say let k:ak not equal to 0
and v1 is a linear combination of v2,...,vn iff a1=ak
 
You want to show that vk is a linear combination of the rest of the vectors. IOW, that vk is a linear combination of v1, v2, ..., vk-1, vk+1, ..., vn.
 
ok, i think i get it