MHB Proving Linear Dependence of r1,r2,r3 Given a,b,c ≠ 0

Suvadip
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Given that
$$r1=2a-3b+c$$
$$r2=3a-5b+2c$$
$$r3=4a-5b+c$$

where $$a, b, c$$ are non-zero and non coplannar vectors

How to prove that $$r1, r2 , r3$$ are linearly dependent?

I have moved with $$c1*r1+c2*r2+c3*r3=0$$
but confused how to show that at leat one of $$c1, c2, c3$$ is non-zero. We only have the information $$a,b,c \neq 0$$ and $$[a b c]\neq 0$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
suvadip;42909I have moved with $$c1*r1+c2*r2+c3*r3=0$$[/quote said:
I'll denote the coefficients by $x_1,x_2,x_3$ instead of $c_1,c_2,c_3$ because the letter $c$ already denotes a vector. Usually the convention is to use, for example, English letters from the beginning of the alphabet possibly followed by subscripts or primes to denote vectors, Greek letters possibly with subscripts or primes to denote real numbers and so on.

You can rearrange the equation
\[
x_1r_1+x_2r_2+x_3r_3=0
\]
to have the form
\[
y_1a+y_2b+y_3c=0\qquad(1)
\]
where $y_1,y_2,y_3$ are some numbers expressed through $x_1,x_2,x_3$. Since $a,b,c$ are non-coplanar and hence linearly independent, (1) happens iff
\[
y_1=y_2=y_3=0.\qquad(2)
\]
Thus you have three equations and three variables $x_1,x_2,x_3$. Since this system is homogeneous (the right-hand side is 0), it has a solution $x_1=x_2=x_3=0$. If there are no other solutions, then no nontrivial combination of $r_1,r_2,r_3$ is 0 and thus the vectors are linearly independent. If there is a nonzero solution to (2), then there exists a nontrivial linear combination of $r_1,r_2,r_3$ that equals zero and so the vectors are linearly dependent.
 
Hello, suvadip!

Given that: .\begin{array}{ccc}r_1&=&2a-3b+c \\ r_2&=&3a-5b+2c \\ r_3&=&4a-5b+c \end{array}

where a, b, c are non-zero, non-coplannar vectors

How to prove that r_1, r_2 , r_3 are linearly dependent?
Show that one of them is a linear combination of the other two.We will show that: .Pr_1 + Qr_2 \:=\:r_3 for some integers P,Q.

. . P(2a-3b+c) + Q(3a-5b+2c) \:=\:4a-5a + c

. . 2Pa - 3Pb + PC + 3Qa - 5Qb + 2Qc \:=\:4a-5b+c

. . (2P+3Q)a - (3P+5Q)b + (P+2Q)c \:=\:4a-5b+c

Equate coefficients: .\begin{Bmatrix}2P + 3Q &=& 4 \\ 3P + 5Q &=& 5 \\ P+2Q &=& 1 \end{Bmatrix}

Solve the system: .P = 5,\;Q = \text{-}2
. . Note: these values must satisfy all three equations.

Therefore, r_1,r_2,r_3 are linearly dependent.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top