Proving μ^(n)=ε in Algebra: Tips and Tricks for a Successful Proof"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that μ^(n) = ε in the context of algebra, specifically involving permutations expressed in cycle notation. Participants are exploring the implications of this equation and the nature of the elements involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest using induction as a potential method for proof, questioning the definitions of μ and ε. There is discussion about the implications of raising elements to a power in modular algebra and the identity element. Some participants express confusion about the notation and the original problem statement.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering various interpretations and approaches. Some have provided insights into the nature of the proof, while others have questioned assumptions and definitions. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the notation used and the specific definitions of μ and ε. Participants are also navigating the complexities of modular arithmetic and the properties of permutations.

Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Let μ=(1...n)
WTS μ^(n)=ε.

I having a hard time seeing how to start the proof. It seems obvious that of you have n elements your going to need n μ's because each μ gets you one number closer to the original number. I've tried transpositions but that didn't seem to work very well, I got lost in all the notation. Any advice would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
perhaps you can use induction:

part 1: prove for case where k=1

then

part 2: assume its true for k and prove its also true for k+1

having said that:

What is μ? what is ε?

Is that a μ * μ * ... μ for n factors?

I'm trying to understand what you are trying to prove in your words or the teachers words.
 
μ is written in cycle notation. If you use induction I can't see any way to get back to the original size μ or use it the imply the n+1 μ=ε. ε is the identity
 
Last edited:
okay so this is modula algebra so for a given set of numbers say 1 thru 12 you must show that any number in the set when raised to the 12th power is the identity element 1 right?
 
so for the identity 1 its clear that 1^n = 1

so for part 2 you can assume that for some k in the set (1...n) that k^n mod n = 1

now can you prove it for (k+1)^n mod n = 1

this seems really tough you'd need to expand the (k+1)^n into n terms and then apply mod n.

what if you set n to 1 ie set is (1) and clearly 1^1 = 1

then you'd be assuming x^k mod k =1

and you'd need to prove x^(k+1) mod (k+1) = 1
 
jedishrfu said:
okay so this is modula algebra so for a given set of numbers say 1 thru 12 you must show that any number in the set when raised to the 12th power is the identity element 1 right?

That's not what Punkyc7 is trying to prove. And it's not even true. 2^3 mod 3 isn't equal to 1, e.g. f=(12...n) is supposed to represent a permutation in cycle notation. So f(1)=2, f(2)=3, ... , f(n)=1. The goal is to show if g=f^n (where multiplication is composition of permutations), that g is the identity permutation. I.e. g(k)=k for all k in {1,...,n}.
 
Last edited:
Dick is right, that is what I am trying to prove
 
Sorry but you didn't respond to my previous post so I started thinking about it a little further in terms of modulo arithmetic and proofs by induction. Please disregard my post then.

Part of my confusion that sometimes posts use keyboard approximations to math notation and that's what I thought I saw here.
 
Punkyc7 said:
Dick is right, that is what I am trying to prove

As you've already said, the proof is almost obvious. Can't you just explain it in words? I'm not sure I can think of any formal symbolism that adds much to that. If f=(i_1,i_2,i_3...i_n) then f(i_1)=i_2. f^2(i_1)=f(f(i_1))=f(i_2)=i_3. f^k(i_1)=i_{1+k}. So finally f^(n-1)(i_1)=i_n, so f^n(i_1)=f(i_n)=i_1. And there's nothing special about i_1. (i_1,i_2,i_3...i_n)=(i_2,i_3,...i_n,i_1). I think formalism here just obscures the blindingly obvious. My opinion.
 
  • #10
that's what I was thinking but I thought there might be a slick way to write it out instead of showing what each cycle does. Thanks for taking your time to help me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K