Proving N!/(N-n)! = N^n with Stirling's Approximation | Stat Mech HW

  • Thread starter Thread starter leright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stat mech
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equation N!/(N-n)! = N^n using Stirling's approximation, specifically for cases where 1 << n << N. Participants confirm the application of Stirling's approximation, where N! is approximated as e^(NlnN - N) and (N-n)! as e^[(N-n)ln(N-n) - N + n]. The key confusion arises in manipulating the exponents during division, leading to the conclusion that N-n can be approximated as N, which is incorrect. The final expression derived is N^N/[(N-n)^(N-n)e^n], indicating a misunderstanding in the simplification process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stirling's approximation
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and logarithms
  • Basic knowledge of factorials and their properties
  • Experience with algebraic manipulation of exponents
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Stirling's approximation in detail
  • Learn about the manipulation of exponential functions in algebra
  • Explore factorial growth rates and their implications in combinatorics
  • Investigate common pitfalls in approximating terms in limits
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in combinatorial mathematics or statistical mechanics, particularly those working with approximations and factorial expressions.

leright
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
19
I am supposed to show that N!/(N-n)! = N^n where 1<<n<<N

I used stirling's approximation to show that N! = e^(NlnN-N) and (N-n)! = e^[(N-n)ln(N-n) - N + n].

I took the ratio of these two terms to get e^[NlnN-N-(N-n)ln(N-n) + N - n]. I canceled terms and get N!/(N-n)! = N^N/[(N-n)^(N-n)e^n], which isn't N^n.

btw, stirlings says that lnN! = NlnN - N.

Can someone give me a hint? That would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what you did with the stirling's approximation is correct

\frac{\exp(N\ln(N) - N)}{\exp((N-n)\ln(N) - N + n)}

so when you divide what do you do with exponents??

o and don't forget N >> n in the end

:wink:
 
stunner5000pt said:
what you did with the stirling's approximation is correct

\frac{\exp(N\ln(N) - N)}{\exp((N-n)\ln(N) - N + n)}

so when you divide what do you do with exponents??

o and don't forget N >> n in the end

:wink:

right, I got that far, and ended up with e^(NlnN-(N-n)ln(N-n)-n) = N^N/[(N-n)^(N-n)e^n].

If I say that N-n is about equal to N I get e^(-n), which is obviously wrong.
 
leright said:
right, I got that far, and ended up with e^(NlnN-(N-n)ln(N-n)-n) = N^N/[(N-n)^(N-n)e^n].

If I say that N-n is about equal to N I get e^(-n), which is obviously wrong.

when you divide you subtract the exponents right?

\frac{\exp(N\ln(N) - N)}{\exp((N-n)\ln(N) - N + n)} = \exp\left(N\ln(N) - N)-((N-n)\ln(N) - N + n)\right) = \exp(N\ln(N) - N - (N-n)\ln(N) + N - n)

right?

add subtract what you can...
 
stunner5000pt said:
when you divide you subtract the exponents right?

\frac{\exp(N\ln(N) - N)}{\exp((N-n)\ln(N) - N + n)} = \exp\left(N\ln(N) - N)-((N-n)\ln(N) - N + n)\right) = \exp(N\ln(N) - N - (N-n)\ln(N) + N - n)

right?

add subtract what you can...

um, of course...that's what I just showed you, except I already canceled the Ns.
 
got it. thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K