I Proving Newton's forward difference interpolation formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving Newton's forward difference interpolation formula, expressed as a polynomial involving coefficients a_n derived from finite differences. The formula starts with the base case where y_0(x_0) equals a_0 and extends to higher-order terms using finite differences. The key point is that the coefficients a_n can be calculated as a_n = (Δ^n y_0) / (h^n n!), where h represents the step size. The conversation also touches on using induction or a triangular matrix approach to derive these coefficients systematically. Overall, the goal is to establish a rigorous proof of the interpolation formula.
PLAGUE
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
How to prove newtons forward difference interpolation formula using induction?
Say, $$y_n (x) = a_0 + a_1(x -x_0) + a_2(x-x_1)(x - x_0) + ... +a_n(x-x_0)(x-x_1)...(x-x_{n-1})$$
Now, $$y_0(x_0) = a_0$$
$$y_1(x_1) = a_0 + a_1(x_1 - x_0)$$
or, $$a_1 = \frac{\Delta y_0}{h}$$
Here, $$h = \frac{x_i - x_0}{i}$$
Similarly, $$a_n = \frac{(\Delta)^n y_0}{h^n n!}$$

Next substituting the values of a, we get the Newton's Forward Interpolation Formula.

It is not difficult to see that ##a_n = \frac{(\Delta)^n y_0}{h^n n!}##. But how do I prove this by induction method? Or any other rigorous way?

Screenshot 2025-08-02 205225.webp
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top