Proving Non-Conjugate Matrices with Characteristic and Minimal Polynomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary
To prove that the given matrices are not conjugate, it is essential to analyze their minimal polynomials in addition to their characteristic polynomials. While all three matrices share the same characteristic polynomial of (1-t)^3, this does not suffice to conclude they are conjugate, as matrices can have the same characteristic polynomial but differ in their minimal polynomials. The discussion emphasizes that conjugate matrices must have identical minimal polynomials, making this a more effective criterion for differentiation. The number of eigenvectors is also mentioned as an invariant under conjugation that can aid in this analysis. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between characteristic and minimal polynomials is crucial in determining the conjugacy of matrices.
Steph
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have a question where I must prove that none of the following matrices are conjugate:

1 1 0
0 1 1
0 0 1

1 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 1

1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1


I started by working out the characteristic polynomials since if these were different, the matrices couldn't be conjugate. But all three have the same characteristic polynomial [(1-t)^3], so that didn't help me.

I'm not sure what else I can do from here. I know that if A and B are conjugate, A = QBP where Q is the inverse of the matrix P. Also, matrices are conjugate if they represent the same linear transformation after a change of basis.

But I'm not sure how to apply these definitions to a specific example.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
minimal polynomial, not characteristic polynomial.another way (equivalent) is to think of some other invariants under conjugation such as the number of eigenvectors.
 
I have written in my notes that conjugate matrices have the same characteristic polynomial -- am I correct if I say that conjugate matrices must have the same characteristic polynomial, but that matrices with the same characteristic polynomial are not necessarily conjugate? Is the point here that the minimal polynomials must also be the same for conjugate matrices, and that this is a more useful condition?


Many thanks for your help - I've used your suggestion and completed that and the rest of the question.
 
Of course conjugate matrices have the same char poly, but as you noted yourself that is not enough to differentiate between non-conjugate matrices. Minimal polys do differentiate between them.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K