Proving Non-Empty Set Theory Equations: A Solution Using Induction Method

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving a set theory equation using the induction method. The problem states that given non-empty sets A, B, and C, where A equals the union of B and C and their intersection is empty, there exists an index k such that the intersection of B_k and C_k is empty, while for all other indices i not equal to k, A_i equals B_i equals C_i. The solution begins with a base case for n=2 and extends the proof to any n, ultimately leading to a contradiction when assuming otherwise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts, including unions and intersections.
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques.
  • Knowledge of proof by contradiction methods.
  • Basic comprehension of indexed sets and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth.
  • Learn about proof by contradiction and its applications in set theory.
  • Explore advanced set theory topics, including Cartesian products and their properties.
  • Investigate the implications of non-empty set conditions in mathematical proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying set theory and proof techniques, as well as educators seeking to understand induction methods in mathematical proofs.

CornMuffin
Messages
51
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Let A = A1 x ... x An
B = B1 x ... x Bn
C = C1 x ... x Cn
Such that A,B,C are non empty, A=B\cup C and B\cap C = \emptyset

prove that there exists a k in {1,...,n} such that B_k\cap C_k = \emptyset
and for i\neq k, A_i = B_i = C_i



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I figure the best way to prove this is by induction.

for n=1, there is nothing to show, so I will start with n=2

Assume B_1 \cap C_1 \neq \emptyset and B_2 \cap C_2 \neq \emptyset

then B \cap C = (B_1 \times B_2 )\cap (C_1 \times C_2) = (B_1 \cap C_1) \times (B_2 \cap C_2)

which implies that B \cap C \neq \emptyset since B_1 \cap C_1 \neq \emptyset and B_2 \cap C_2 \neq \emptyset

but this is a contradiction to our conditions, therefore, there exists a k in {1,...,n} such that B_k\cap C_k = \emptyset


it seems like this can be easily extended for any n



but i am having trouble proving the second part of the problem:
for i\neq k, A_i = B_i = C_i

I tried using proof by contradiction for n=2, but i couldn't get anywhere with that


Any hints on what I should try?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to prove two things:

B_i\subseteq A_i~\text{and}~A_i\subseteq B_i

The first is not so hard: pick x_i\in B_i, extend it to an element of B. And use that B\cup C=A.

The second is more difficult. Pick x_i\in A_i. Assume that it is not in B_i. Try to extend x_i to an element you know is not in B\cup C. This will be a contradiction. (hint: pick a x_k\in C_k).
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K