Proving Orthogonality of θ_{ik}V^k to U_i

  • Thread starter Thread starter devd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views
devd
Messages
47
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the tensor
θ[itex]_{ik}[/itex] = [itex]g_{ik} - U_{i}U_{k}[/itex]
projects any vector, [itex]V^{k}[/itex], into a 3-surface orthogonal to the unit time-like
vector [itex]U_{i}[/itex] (By a projection, the vector [itex]θ_{ik}V_{k}[/itex], is implied).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The projection should be,
[itex]θ_{ik} V^k = g_{ik} V^k - U_i U_k V^k<br /> \Rightarrow θ_{ik} V^k U_i = g_{ik} V^k U_i - U_i U_k V^k U_i[/itex]. This should equal zero, for the projection to be orthogonal. But, I'm not being able to proceed.
By timelike, the problem means [itex]U_i U^i \ge 0[/itex], right? But, i don't see how that helps me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
devd said:
Show that the tensor
θ[itex]_{ik}[/itex] = [itex]g_{ik} - U_{i}U_{k}[/itex]
projects any vector, [itex]V^{k}[/itex], into a 3-surface orthogonal to the unit time-like
vector [itex]U_{i}[/itex] (By a projection, the vector [itex]θ_{ik}V_{k}[/itex], is implied).
The phrase "unit time-like vector ##U_i##" is important. What do you think "unit" means here?

[...] By timelike, the problem means [itex]U_i U^i \ge 0[/itex], right? But, i don't see how that helps me.
Yes, but (again), what does "unit" mean here?

The projection should be,
[itex]θ_{ik} V^k = g_{ik} V^k - U_i U_k V^k<br /> \Rightarrow θ_{ik} V^k U_i = g_{ik} V^k U_i - U_i U_k V^k U_i[/itex].
Whenever you're contracting indices in such contexts, it should be between an upstairs and a downstairs pair of indices. So your last part should be
$$\theta_{ik} V^k U^i ~=~ g_{ik} V^k U^i - U_i U_k V^k U^i $$Now, can you simplify these subexpressions:
$$g_{ik} U^i ~~~\text{and}~~~ U_i U^i ~~~?$$Then consider further my remarks about the meaning of "unit"...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ohho, sorry! I missed the 'unit' bit. [itex]U_i U_k[/itex] can be written as [itex]g_{ik} U_i U^i[/itex]. Now, [itex]U_i[/itex] is a unit timelike vector. By definition, then, [itex]U_i U^i =[/itex] 1. Then, the terms cancel and the result follows, right! Thanks for pointing that out! :)