Proving Orthogonality of θ_{ik}V^k to U_i

  • Thread starter Thread starter devd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the tensor θ_{ik} = g_{ik} - U_{i}U_{k} projects any vector V^{k} into a 3-surface orthogonal to the unit timelike vector U_{i}. The projection is expressed as θ_{ik} V^k = g_{ik} V^k - U_i U_k V^k, which must equal zero for orthogonality. The participants clarify that U_i U^i = 1, confirming that U_i is a unit timelike vector, leading to the cancellation of terms and validating the projection's orthogonality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the metric tensor g_{ik}
  • Knowledge of timelike vectors and their properties
  • Basic concepts of vector projections in differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the metric tensor in general relativity
  • Learn about vector projections in Riemannian geometry
  • Explore the implications of unit timelike vectors in physics
  • Investigate the role of orthogonality in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics and mathematics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, differential geometry, and tensor analysis.

devd
Messages
47
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the tensor
θ_{ik} = g_{ik} - U_{i}U_{k}
projects any vector, V^{k}, into a 3-surface orthogonal to the unit time-like
vector U_{i} (By a projection, the vector θ_{ik}V_{k}, is implied).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The projection should be,
θ_{ik} V^k = g_{ik} V^k - U_i U_k V^k<br /> \Rightarrow θ_{ik} V^k U_i = g_{ik} V^k U_i - U_i U_k V^k U_i. This should equal zero, for the projection to be orthogonal. But, I'm not being able to proceed.
By timelike, the problem means U_i U^i \ge 0, right? But, i don't see how that helps me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
devd said:
Show that the tensor
θ_{ik} = g_{ik} - U_{i}U_{k}
projects any vector, V^{k}, into a 3-surface orthogonal to the unit time-like
vector U_{i} (By a projection, the vector θ_{ik}V_{k}, is implied).
The phrase "unit time-like vector ##U_i##" is important. What do you think "unit" means here?

[...] By timelike, the problem means U_i U^i \ge 0, right? But, i don't see how that helps me.
Yes, but (again), what does "unit" mean here?

The projection should be,
θ_{ik} V^k = g_{ik} V^k - U_i U_k V^k<br /> \Rightarrow θ_{ik} V^k U_i = g_{ik} V^k U_i - U_i U_k V^k U_i.
Whenever you're contracting indices in such contexts, it should be between an upstairs and a downstairs pair of indices. So your last part should be
$$\theta_{ik} V^k U^i ~=~ g_{ik} V^k U^i - U_i U_k V^k U^i $$Now, can you simplify these subexpressions:
$$g_{ik} U^i ~~~\text{and}~~~ U_i U^i ~~~?$$Then consider further my remarks about the meaning of "unit"...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ohho, sorry! I missed the 'unit' bit. U_i U_k can be written as g_{ik} U_i U^i. Now, U_i is a unit timelike vector. By definition, then, U_i U^i = 1. Then, the terms cancel and the result follows, right! Thanks for pointing that out! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K