Proving P(n) for nCr Using Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter soulflyfgm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the statement P(n) that nCr is a natural number for all natural numbers n and for all r where 0 ≤ r ≤ n. The formula nCr = n!/(r!(n-r)!) is utilized, and the base case P(0) is established as belonging to the natural numbers. The inductive step is confirmed using the identity (n+1)Cr = nCr + nC(r-1), which is valid for all n, ensuring that both nC0 and nCn are also integers. The proof is validated, with a note that 0C0 equals 1, correcting an earlier misconception.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial mathematics, specifically binomial coefficients.
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction as a proof technique.
  • Knowledge of factorial notation and properties.
  • Basic concepts of natural numbers and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth.
  • Explore combinatorial identities and their proofs, such as Pascal's Triangle.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of binomial coefficients in combinatorics.
  • Investigate advanced topics in combinatorial mathematics, such as generating functions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying combinatorics, educators teaching mathematical induction, and anyone interested in proofs involving binomial coefficients.

soulflyfgm
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
i have this so far..please tell me if this is right..do u think this prove is correct

Let P(n) be the statement that for any n in the natural numbers N, nCr is an element of N for every r with 0<= r<= n
nCr = n!/(r!(n-r)!)
0Cr = o!/(r!(0-r)!) = 0( here i don't know wat r is..im guessing r has to be 0 because of the 0<= r<= n)

so P(0)E(belongs) in N (natural numbers)
Suppose P(n) is a natural number of any N
then since {n+1}Cr = nCr + nC{r-1} is true ( already proved it algebraically and i will add it to this part) so it follows that the {n+1}Cr are natural numbers for all n. Hence, by inducion, nCr is a natural number for all n and all r.

can some one review this prove and tell me if its right? thank you so much for ur help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0C0 is 1, not 0. apart from that your idea is correct, though you also need to note that nC0 and nCn are integers, otherwise the identity you've written down

(n+1)Cr = nCr +nC(r-1)

is no help if r=n+1 or 0 then one of the terms on the left is undefined (by you).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K