Proving Proper Time of Photon in Friedman Metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proper time differential for a photon in flat space is zero, as established by the Minkowski metric where the velocity of light equals c, resulting in a zero right-hand side. This principle extends to the Schwarzschild and Friedman metrics, where the spacetime interval remains zero along null paths. Proper time is defined only for timelike world lines, while null paths, such as those followed by photons, inherently have zero intervals. This conclusion aligns with the principle of equivalence in General Relativity, asserting that if true in Special Relativity, it holds locally in General Relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski metric in Special Relativity
  • Familiarity with Schwarzschild and Friedman metrics in General Relativity
  • Knowledge of spacetime intervals and their definitions
  • Concept of null paths and their implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the principle of equivalence in General Relativity
  • Explore the properties of spacetime intervals in various metrics
  • Learn about the behavior of massless particles in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of proper time in different metrics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of General Relativity and the behavior of light in various spacetime geometries.

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
If I understand it correctly, the proper time differential for a photon in flat space is zero. That is evident if the velocity of light is equal to c, so the right hand side of the Minkowski metric is equal to zero. Therefore the left side must also be zero.

My question: Is the same true for the Schwarzschild and Freidman metrics? I think yes, but I don’t know how to prove it. Thanks for any information about that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but technically it is the spacetime interval that is 0, not proper time. Proper time is only defined for timelike world lines
 
Well, it is a matter of definition. A null path is defined as one with zero interval along it. If you are asking why light follows such a path, this follows from a photon having no mass, which is subject to experiment, plus that if it is true in SR, it must true locally - as differential statement - everywhere in GR by the principle of equivalence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: exmarine

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K