Proving Properties of Lim Sup: Sequences and Limits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving properties of the limit superior of a sequence, specifically the sequence defined as ##(a_n)##. The limit superior is expressed mathematically as ##\overline{\lim}_{n \to \infty} a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sup \{a_k ~|~ k \ge n \}##. The participants aim to demonstrate three key properties: (i) the existence of indices where the sequence exceeds a certain threshold, (ii) the boundedness of the sequence above a limit, and (iii) the behavior of the limit superior under scalar multiplication. The discussion highlights the necessity of establishing contradictions to prove these properties effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit superior in sequences
  • Familiarity with supremum and its properties
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions in analysis
  • Basic concepts of mathematical proofs and contradictions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of supremum and infimum in real analysis
  • Learn about epsilon-delta proofs in the context of limits
  • Explore the implications of scalar multiplication on sequences
  • Investigate further examples of limit superior in different types of sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis or sequences and series, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of limit superior properties.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



The limit superior of a sequence ##(a_n)## is defined as ##\overline{\lim}_{n \to \infty} a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sup \{a_k ~|~ k \ge n \}##. Letting ##L = \overline{\lim}_{n \to \infty} a_n##, I am asked to prove the following:

(i) For each ##N## and for each ##\epsilon > 0##, there exists some ##k > N## such that ##a_k \ge L - \epsilon##.

(ii) For each ##\epsilon > 0##, there is some ##N## such that ##a_k \le L + \epsilon## for all ##k > N##.

(iii) ##\overline{\lim}_{n \to \infty} ca_n = c \overline{\lim}_{n \to \infty} a_n##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



(iii) is rather easy to prove: it just follows from the fact that ##\sup(cA) = c \sup (A)## and ##\lim_{n \to \infty} c x_n = c \lim_{n \to \infty} x_n## for ##c \ge 0##, so I will move on to the first and second part

Let ##\epsilon > 0## and ##N \in \Bbb{N}##. Since ##L = \overline{\lim}_{n \to \infty} a_n##, then there exists a ##K \in \Bbb{N}## such that ##| \sup \{a_k ~|~ k \ge n \} - L | < \epsilon## for every ##n \ge K## or ##L - \epsilon < \sup \{a_k ~|~ k \ge n \} < \epsilon + L## for every ##n \ge K##.. On the one hand, we get ##a_k \le \sup \{a_k ~|~ k \ge n \} < \epsilon + L## for every ##k \ge K##, which proves part (ii). However, I don't see how to prove part (i). Also, as you may have noticed, I can only get strict inequality in part (ii).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To prove part (i), assume it is false, so that there is some ##\epsilon>0## and positive integer ##N## such that ##\forall k>N:\ a_k<L-\epsilon##.

Can you get an upper bound for lim sup of the sequence from that, that is less than ##L##? If so, that's the contradiction we need.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K