Is the Intersection of Subrings of R a Subring of R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lostinmath08
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The intersection of subrings S and T of a ring R is definitively a subring of R. This conclusion is supported by the axioms of subrings, which require closure under addition and multiplication. Specifically, any intersection of subrings retains these properties, confirming that the intersection is indeed a subring. The smallest subring containing a subset X of R is generated by X, reinforcing the foundational structure of ring theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and its axioms
  • Familiarity with subring definitions and properties
  • Knowledge of set theory, particularly intersections
  • Basic mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of subrings in abstract algebra
  • Learn about the generation of rings and subrings
  • Explore examples of intersections of subrings in various rings
  • Investigate the implications of ring homomorphisms on subrings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the structural properties of rings and subrings.

lostinmath08
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. The Problem

If S and T are subrings of a ring R, show that S intersects T, is a subring of R.




The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to go about answering this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the requirements for a subset of R to be a subring?
 
The following axioms must be satisfied
a) (for all or any) x,y E R implies x+(-y) E R
b) (for all or any) x,y E R implies xy E R ( R is closed under mulitplication)

The above are the requirements for a subring to be valid.

This is something i got from wikipedia:

Let R be a ring. Any intersection of subrings of R is again a subring of R. Therefore, if X is any subset of R, the intersection of all subrings of R containing X is a subring S of R. S is the smallest subring of R containing X. ("Smallest" means that if T is any other subring of R containing X, then S is contained in T.) S is said to be the subring of R generated by X. If S = R, we may say that the ring R is generated by X.

So then does S=T?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K