Proving Sigma-Algebra Generated by Elementary Events

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jetoso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary Events
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the sigma-algebra generated by a set of elementary events A, derived from a countable sample space W, is equivalent to the power set 2^W. Participants clarify that a sigma-algebra must include the empty set, complements, and countable unions of its subsets. The proof involves demonstrating that any subset S of W can be expressed as a countable union of elementary events, thus confirming that S belongs to the sigma-algebra generated by A. The conclusion is that Sigma-Algebra(F) equals 2^W, encompassing all possible subsets of W.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sigma-algebra definitions and properties
  • Familiarity with countable sets and unions
  • Knowledge of set theory, particularly power sets
  • Basic principles of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of sigma-algebras in measure theory
  • Explore the concept of countable unions and intersections in set theory
  • Learn about DeMorgan's Laws and their applications in set operations
  • Investigate the relationship between cardinality and set equality
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced mathematics, and anyone studying measure theory or set theory, particularly those interested in the properties of sigma-algebras and their applications.

jetoso
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Let W be a sample space with a countable number of outcomes. Let A be the set of elementary events (an elementary event is a set containing only one outcome from the sample space). Prove that the sigma-algebra generated by A is the set of all subsets.


Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A sigma algebra es defines as a set which contains the empty set, any set and its complement and infinite unios of such subsets from the sample space.
The case here is that I came up with the fact that must prove that a sigma-algebra generated by a set of elementary events must have asmany elements as 2^W, where W is the sample space where we generated the set A of elementary events and the sigma-algebra from A.

I thought it could be proven by induction.
 
No, you prove it by showing that any element in the power set can be constructed using those operations on the collection of elementary events. Note a sigma algebra is closed under countable union, not infinite union.

(demonstrating two sets have equal cardinality says nothing about them being equal, necessarily)
 
That is true. So it is close by finite unions and by DeMorgan's Law it is also by finite intersection, right?
Then if |W| = n, and A = {set of elementary events from sample space W}, a sigma-algebra generated by A would have 2^W elements.
 
You cannot argue by cardinality, it is a useless tactic, since the same argument you've just used states that the rationals and the naturals are the same subset of R.

Let X be some subset of W.

Write X as a countable union of sets that are definitely in the sigma algebra (you do get that countable sets may be infinite too?)
 
Thank you very much for your advice.


I think I could say this:
Suppose we have a countable set:
W = {a1, a2, ..., an}
And a set of elementary events:
F = { {a1}, {a2}, ..., {an} }

Then the sigma-algebra generated by F, say Sigma-Algebra(F)=2^W, where 2^W is the set of all subsets.

Let A belongs to 2^W, (let A be contained in W), and
A = {b1, b2, ..., bn} then A = U{bn} from n=1, infinity

Then the sigma-algebra(F) has all the possible subsets and their complement in all possible combinations, thus we can say that: Sigma-algebra(F) = 2^W



How about that?
I feel I am still missing something...
 
Notationally that is wrong.

Let S be any subset of W. We must simply show that S is in B(A) the sigma algebra generated by A.

Since S =U{s}, where the union is taken over s in S, and such is a countable union, since S is a subset of a countable set, it follows that S is in the sigma algebra generated by A.

End of proof.

Your sets have terminal elements, last ones, for some reason. They need not.
 
Oh, I see. Thank you very much for your explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
897
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K