Proving Simple Limit Convergence

  • Thread starter Thread starter hartigan83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of the series defined by a(sub n) = (2/3)[2^n - 2^(-n)] from n=1 to infinity. Participants are exploring the application of the ratio test and the behavior of the series as n approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the ratio test to determine convergence, with some expressing uncertainty about how to evaluate limits. Others question the assumptions regarding the convergence of the sequence and the implications of its terms growing larger as n increases.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the limit involved in the ratio test, with some participants suggesting that the series diverges based on the behavior of its terms. Multiple interpretations of the series' convergence are being considered, and some guidance has been offered regarding the evaluation of limits.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which require a formal proof of convergence or divergence. There is a noted lack of consensus on the correct approach to proving the series' behavior.

hartigan83
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
simple limit?

Homework Statement


I am trying to prove if a series is convergent.
the series is a(sub n) = (2/3)[2^n - 2^(-n)] from n=1 to infinity.

Homework Equations


Ratio test:
the limit as n approached infinity of the absolute value of a(sub n+1) /a(sub n) equals r.
If r is less than one the series converges.
if r is greater than 1 the series diverges.


The Attempt at a Solution



lim as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of
(2/3 * (2^(n+1) - 2 ^(-n+1)))
(2/3 * (2^n - 2^(-n)))
eqauls r
the 2/3 cancel and I get
lim as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of
(2^(n+1) - 2 ^(-n+1))
(2^n - 2^(-n))
eqauls r
this is where I get stuck. Looking at the graph of this function, I can see that the limit is 2. But I don't know how to show it. It has been a long time since I took Calc...
PLEASE HELP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about the series \sum a_n or a power series
\sum a_n x^n

or something else
?
 
gammamcc said:
Are you talking about the series \sum a_n or a power series
\sum a_n x^n

or something else
?

The series sum, sigma notation sorry I just dindt know how to put that on here
 
Isn't it obvious that the sequence (2/3)(2n- 2-n) does not converge to 0?
 
a_n = (2/3)[2^n - 2^(-n)] from n=1 to infinity.=

a_n=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{2}{3}(2^n - 2^{-n}) \lim_{1\rightarrow\infty}

Am I being dim here, but isn't it obvious that the total becomes arbitrarily large as n increases. Therefore it does not converge?

2^n increases as n increases

2^-n decreases as n increases

thus 2/3(2^n-2^-n) becomes increasingly large, thus the sum does not converge, the 2/3 outside the brackets makes no difference to this in this case.
 
Last edited:
HallsofIvy said:
Isn't it obvious that the sequence (2/3)(2n- 2-n) does not converge to 0?

I thought that the sequence diverged but I have to prove it not just say that it does and I don't know exactally how to show it
Thats why I was using the ration test...but I couldn't figure out how to do the limits.
 
Schrödinger's Dog said:
a_n = (2/3)[2^n - 2^(-n)] from n=1 to infinity.=

a_n=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{2}{3}(2^n - 2^{-n}) \lim_{1\rightarrow\infty}

Am I being dim here, but isn't it obvious that the total becomes arbitrarily large as n increases. Therefore it does not converge?

2^n increases as n increases

2^-n decreases as n increases

thus 2/3(2^n-2^-n) becomes increasingly large, thus the sum does not converge, the 2/3 outside the brackets makes no difference to this in this case.

right I see that but I am not sure how to "prove it" I guess I need to show that the limit is infinity but I don't know how.
 
hartigan83 said:

Homework Statement


I am trying to prove if a series is convergent.
the series is a(sub n) = (2/3)[2^n - 2^(-n)] from n=1 to infinity.

Homework Equations


Ratio test:
the limit as n approached infinity of the absolute value of a(sub n+1) /a(sub n) equals r.
If r is less than one the series converges.
if r is greater than 1 the series diverges.


The Attempt at a Solution



lim as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of
(2/3 * (2^(n+1) - 2 ^(-n+1)))
(2/3 * (2^n - 2^(-n)))
eqauls r
the 2/3 cancel and I get
lim as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of
(2^(n+1) - 2 ^(-n+1))
(2^n - 2^(-n))
eqauls r
this is where I get stuck. Looking at the graph of this function, I can see that the limit is 2. But I don't know how to show it. It has been a long time since I took Calc...
PLEASE HELP

Homework Statement



may be it will help if I included the whole problem, maybe I am not doing it correctly at all.

Consider the sequence 1,5/2,21/4,85/8,... defined by s(sub1) =1 , a(sub2)=5/2 and a(subn)= (5/2)a(subn-1) - a(subn-2)

A.) Show that a(subn) = (2/3)[2^n -2^(-n)] for any n greaterthan or equal to 3.

B.) Is the series (sigma notation) from n=1 to infinity a(subn) convergent? (prove your answer)

What I have done:
For A.) I have proven the base case and am working on the inductive step. I know that for the inductive step, I need to show that assuming a(subn) and everything below it is true, that a(subn+1)= (5/2)a(subn) - a(subn-1) = (2/3)[2^(n+1) -2^(-n+1)] , but my algebra isn't working out. so I am still pluggin away at that.
For B.) I was thinking that if I show (2/3)[2^n -2^(-n) is divergent, which I can clearly see, but don't know how to prove (I was thinking of using the ratio test as quoted above)then I can conclude that Is the series (sigma notation) from n=1 to infinity a(subn) is divergent.
so can someone help me with this equation if my reasoning is correct::rolleyes:

lim as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of
(2^(n+1) - 2 ^(-n+1))
(2^n - 2^(-n))
I need help showing my steps for getting the limit. :confused:
when I plugged this equation into my calculator, I got a straight line through y=2 so I am thinking this means the limit as n approaches infinity the limit is 2, and thus by the ratio test it is divergent...
 
So, you have \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left|\frac{2^{n+1}-2^{1-n}}{2^n-2^{-n}}\right|, supposing you have used the ratio test correctly. Now, can you evaluate this limit? Hint: divided top and bottom by 2n
 
  • #10
There is a very nice theorem that says if
\Sigma_{n=0}^\infty a_n
converges then {an} must converge to 0. It's contrapositive is that if {an} does not converge to 0, then \Sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n (2/3)(2n+ 2-n) does not converge to 0. That should be easy. (In fact, it goes to infinity!)
 
  • #11
cristo said:
So, you have \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left|\frac{2^{n+1}-2^{1-n}}{2^n-2^{-n}}\right|, supposing you have used the ratio test correctly. Now, can you evaluate this limit? Hint: divided top and bottom by 2n

I am not sure how do do it without getting common denomionators and such... so here is my algebra... I know that all of them have absolute value and the lim next to them but I can't figure out how to use them so I will just write the frations.

2^(2n+2) -1
2^(n+1)
divided by:
2^(2n)-1
2^n

which is
(2^(2n+2)-1)(2^n)
(2^(n+1))(2^(2n)-1)

which is
(2^(2n+2)-1)(2^n)
(2^(2n+1)-2)(2^n)

then the 2^n cancel and I am left with
(2^(2n+2)-1)
(2^(2n+1)-2)

which is
(2^(2n)*(2^2))-1
(2^(2n)*(2))-2

which is
1/2? so the limit is 1/2?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
as HallsofIvy says, it is quite obvious (painfully) that the series diverge.

consider the series, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1... obviously, it diverges, now consider the original series, every term eventually becomes bigger than 1... so...
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I'm not sure what you've done there. I said divide top and bottom by 2n to obtain \left|\frac{2^{n+1}-2^{1-n}}{2^n-2^{-n}}\right|=\left|\frac{2-2^{1-2n}}{1-2^{2n}}\right|\rightarrow ?

If you can see what this tends to, then you can work out your answer using the ratio test. However, Halls has given you a nice theorem which is quicker to use!
 
  • #14
Thanks all I figured it out :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K