Proving Subspace Dimension Inequality: W <= V in Vector Space V

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dosmascerveza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that if W is a subspace of vector space V, then the dimension of W is less than or equal to the dimension of V. Participants are exploring the properties of vector spaces and subspaces in the context of linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present attempts at a proof, noting that W has a basis in V and discussing the implications of dimensions of bases. Some participants question the terminology used regarding dimensions and bases, while others suggest considering specific cases, such as W being the zero vector space.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and suggesting areas for clarification. There is a recognition of the need for rigor in the proof, particularly regarding the definitions and properties of bases and dimensions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about theorems or corollaries that may have been previously established, and there is mention of the assumption that the vector spaces involved are finite-dimensional. Additionally, there is a note about avoiding duplicate questions in the forum.

Dosmascerveza
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Ok I am doing some additional problems because my professor assigns evens and i do odd and evens so i can at least check my work in backs of book.


Prove that if W is a subspace of vector space V, dim(W) is less than or equal to dim(V).

Proof: We know W is a subspace of V and therefore has a basis. The basis in W is in V and we also know V has a basis. If the basis for W has same dimension as a basis for V then W is V and we are done. Since V contains W that means the basis for W must be a linear combination of vectors in basis of V. So since every w in W can be generated by a basis in V then then dimV cannot be smaller than dimW. there for dimW<=dimV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Linear Algebra Proof, (please check my reasoning)

Here is my questionable attempt at a proof for my LA class
my professor assigns evens so we can't even check our homework so i do both odds and evens but even then I can't check my proofs so easily.

Prove that if W is a subspace of vector space V, dim(W) is less than or equal to dim(V).

Proof: We know W is a subspace of V and therefore has a basis. The basis in W is in V and we also know V has a basis. If the basis for W has same dimension as a basis for V then W is V and we are done. Since V contains W that means the basis for W must be a linear combination of vectors in basis of V. So since every w in W can be generated by a basis in V then then dim(V) cannot be smaller than dim(W). there for dim(W)<=dim(V).
 


bump please help! don't be shy
 
Dosmascerveza said:
Ok I am doing some additional problems because my professor assigns evens and i do odd and evens so i can at least check my work in backs of book.Prove that if W is a subspace of vector space V, dim(W) is less than or equal to dim(V).

Proof: We know W is a subspace of V and therefore has a basis. The basis in W is in V and we also know V has a basis. If the basis for W has same dimension as a basis for V then W is V and we are done. Since V contains W that means the basis for W must be a linear combination of vectors in basis of V. So since every w in W can be generated by a basis in V then then dimV cannot be smaller than dimW. there for dimW<=dimV.

more rigourously, try wording it in terms of the replacement theorem. I think you may have to prove that the subspace is finite-dimensional as well, if V is finite dimensional
 
Dosmascerveza said:
Ok I am doing some additional problems because my professor assigns evens and i do odd and evens so i can at least check my work in backs of book.


Prove that if W is a subspace of vector space V, dim(W) is less than or equal to dim(V).

Proof: We know W is a subspace of V and therefore has a basis. The basis in W is in V and we also know V has a basis. If the basis for W has same dimension as a basis for V then W is V and we are done. Since V contains W that means the basis for W must be a linear combination of vectors in basis of V. So since every w in W can be generated by a basis in V then then dimV cannot be smaller than dimW. there for dimW<=dimV.
I think it would be a little clearer to use the fact that, for V of dimension n, a set of more than n vectors in V cannot be independent.
 


Dosmascerveza said:
Here is my questionable attempt at a proof for my LA class
my professor assigns evens so we can't even check our homework so i do both odds and evens but even then I can't check my proofs so easily.

Prove that if W is a subspace of vector space V, dim(W) is less than or equal to dim(V).

It can be challenging to give advice on such problems because I don't know what theorems/corollaries you've already proved, or even if your vector spaces are all finite dimensional. I'll assume that all spaces are finite dimensional.

Proof: We know W is a subspace of V and therefore has a basis.

You should consider the case W = {0}, although it's trivial.

The basis in W is in V and we also know V has a basis. If the basis for W has same dimension as a basis for V then W is V and we are done.

Remark: Bases don't have dimensions, only spaces and subspaces do. You probably meant to say something like: If the basis for W has the same number of elements as a basis for V, then W = V and we are done.

Since V contains W that means the basis for W must be a linear combination of vectors in basis of V. So since every w in W can be generated by a basis in V then then dim(V) cannot be smaller than dim(W). there for dim(W)<=dim(V).

Again, your terminology is inexact. A basis can't be a linear combination of vectors, but the elements of the basis (which are vectors) can be.

I find your statements in the last quote to be confusing. Have you already proved that, if dim (V) = n, then no set of linearly independent vectors in V can contain more than n elements? If so, I suggest that you try to base a proof on that.

Please post again if my comments aren't clear or if you have any questions.

Petek
 
Please note that the original poster also posed this question https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=349098 in the homework thread.

@Dosmascerveza: Please post a question only in one thread to avoid duplication of efforts by those who are trying to help you. Thanks.

Petek
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K