Proving that a limit is non-existent

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathoholic!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
Mathoholic!
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The function is:
f: D={(x,y)[itex]\in[/itex]ℝ2:x+y≠0}→ℝ
(x,y)→[itex]\frac{x-y}{x+y}[/itex]

They ask you to prove that the limit as (x,y)→(0,0) is non-existent.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt at a solution was using the definition of limit: If there was a limit (L[itex]\in[/itex]ℝ) when (x,y)→(0,0), then [itex]\forall[/itex]ε>0 there would be a δ>0 for which:

||(x,y)||<δ →(implied) |f(x,y)-L|<ε

I tried guessing an ε for which there was no δ, hence proving the non-existence of the limit, but I can't seem to find it.

Another attempt at a solution was changing the expression to polar coordinates which gave me the following:

f(r,θ)=[itex]\frac{cosθ-senθ}{cosθ+senθ}[/itex] [itex]\forall[/itex]r>0

The limit when r→0 is always the same: f(r,θ). But since the function oscillates indeterminately, there's no limit.

Am I doing this right? I really need some good feedback on this ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have some interesting ideas. My simple version would be to note that if you approach (0,0) along the two axes, you get different limits.
 
It should be sufficient to point out that there exist points (x, y), on the line y= x, arbitrarily close to (0, 0) such that f(x, y)= 0 and, on the line y= -x, arbtririly close to (0, 0), for which f(x, y) is not defined.