MHB Proving that a ring is non a PID

  • Thread starter Thread starter pantboio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pid Ring
pantboio
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Let $$R=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$, let $$p$$ be a prime in $$\mathbb{N}$$, $$p\neq 2,13$$. Suppose that $$p$$ divides an integer of the form $$a^2+13b^2$$, with $$a,b$$ integers and coprime. Let $$P=(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$$ be the ideal generated in $$R$$ by $$p$$ and $$a+b\sqrt{-13}$$ and let $$\overline{P}=(p,a-b\sqrt{-13})$$.

1)Prove that $$P\cdot\overline{P}=pR$$

2)Prove that if $$P$$ is principal then $$p=A^2+13B^2$$ for some $$A,B$$ integers

3) Prove that if $$p=a^2+13b^2$$ then $$P$$ is principal

4) Deduce that $$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$ is not a PIDI have a proof of point 1). Indeed it is easily seen that $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ can be generated by $$p^2,p(a\pm b\sqrt{-13}),a^2+13b^2$$, all elements of $$pR$$. Conversely, i proved that we may always suppose, without loss of generality, that $$p^2$$ does not divide $$a^2+13b^2$$ hence $$p=\gcd(p^2,a^2+13b^2)$$, and this last fact implies that $$p$$ can be expressed as $$\mathbb{Z}$$-linear combination of $$p^2$$ and $$a^2+13b^2$$, both elements of $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ so that we get the inclusion $$pR\subseteq P\cdot\overline{P}$$.

For the other points, any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pantboio said:
Let $$R=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$, let $$p$$ be a prime in $$\mathbb{N}$$, $$p\neq 2,13$$. Suppose that $$p$$ divides an integer of the form $$a^2+13b^2$$, with $$a,b$$ integers and coprime. Let $$P=(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$$ be the ideal generated in $$R$$ by $$p$$ and $$a+b\sqrt{-13}$$ and let $$\overline{P}=(p,a-b\sqrt{-13})$$.

1)Prove that $$P\cdot\overline{P}=pR$$

2)Prove that if $$P$$ is principal then $$p=A^2+13B^2$$ for some $$A,B$$ integers

3) Prove that if $$p=a^2+13b^2$$ then $$P$$ is principal

4) Deduce that $$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$ is not a PIDI have a proof of point 1). Indeed it is easily seen that $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ can be generated by $$p^2,p(a\pm b\sqrt{-13}),a^2+13b^2$$, all elements of $$pR$$. Conversely, i proved that we may always suppose, without loss of generality, that $$p^2$$ does not divide $$a^2+13b^2$$ hence $$p=\gcd(p^2,a^2+13b^2)$$, and this last fact implies that $$p$$ can be expressed as $$\mathbb{Z}$$-linear combination of $$p^2$$ and $$a^2+13b^2$$, both elements of $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ so that we get the inclusion $$pR\subseteq P\cdot\overline{P}$$.

For the other points, any help would be appreciated
For 2), suppose that $P$ is principal, say $P = (A+B\sqrt{-13})$, for some $A,\;B\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then $\overline{P} = (A-B\sqrt{-13})$, and $P\cdot\overline{P} = (A^2+13B^2)$. But $p\in P\cdot\overline{P}$ (by (1)), and so $p$ is a multiple of $A^2+13B^2$. Now use that fact that $p$ is prime in $\mathbb{Z}$ to deduce that $p=A^2+13B^2$.

For 3), if $p=a^2+13b^2 = (a+b\sqrt{-13})(a-b\sqrt{-13})$, then clearly $P = (a+b\sqrt{-13})$, which is principal.

For 4), you just need to find a prime $p$ in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is not of the form $a^2+13b^2$, but which has a multiple of that form (try $p=11$). Then by (1) and (2) $(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$ is not principal.
 
Opalg said:
For 2), suppose that $P$ is principal, say $P = (A+B\sqrt{-13})$, for some $A,\;B\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then $\overline{P} = (A-B\sqrt{-13})$, and $P\cdot\overline{P} = (A^2+13B^2)$. But $p\in P\cdot\overline{P}$ (by (1)), and so $p$ is a multiple of $A^2+13B^2$. Now use that fact that $p$ is prime in $\mathbb{Z}$ to deduce that $p=A^2+13B^2$.

For 3), if $p=a^2+13b^2 = (a+b\sqrt{-13})(a-b\sqrt{-13})$, then clearly $P = (a+b\sqrt{-13})$, which is principal.

For 4), you just need to find a prime $p$ in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is not of the form $a^2+13b^2$, but which has a multiple of that form (try $p=11$). Then by (1) and (2) $(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$ is not principal.
Almost all is clear now for me, thanks. According to your suggestion, i take the prime $$p=11$$, which is not of the form $$A^2+13\cdot B^2$$, but has a multiple, namely its square $$121$$ such that $$121=2^2+13\cdot 3^2$$ so that the ideal $$(11,2+3\sqrt{-13})$$ is not principal, thanks to 2). There are left only few questions I summarize as follows:

1) What is the role played by point 3) in all this?? I mean, I've used only 2) to state that the ideal is non-principal...?

2) Why (in the book where i found this exercise) are we prevented from taking $$p=2,13$$?
 
pantboio said:
1) What is the role played by point 3) in all this?? I mean, I've used only 2) to state that the ideal is non-principal...?
As far as I can see, (3) is not actually needed for the rest of the question. I suppose it is just there for its intrinsic interest. :confused:

pantboio said:
2) Why (in the book where i found this exercise) are we prevented from taking $$p=2,13$$?
In your proof of (1), you said "we may always suppose, without loss of generality, that $p^2$ does not divide $a^2+13b^2$".
You may find that supposition is not valid if $p=2$ or $13$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
462
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K