Graduate Proving that this integral is divergent

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the divergence of an integral involving the function σ(x) = 1/x^(2-ε) for ε > 0. The differential equation derived from this function leads to a solution of the form u(x) = √x cos(√3/2 log x), which needs to be shown as unbounded. A sequence x_n is introduced where cos(x_n) = 1, leading to the conclusion that u(x_n) increases without bound as n approaches infinity. The final suggestion emphasizes analyzing the behavior of oscillatory functions to establish bounds for their extrema, supporting the claim of divergence.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR
I have a particular integral that I need to show that it cannot be finite in L1(positive real line) space. The integral comes from an Euler-Cauchy ODE. I want to show that the answer is not bounded.
Dear everyone,

I have a question on how to show that an integral is divigent. Here is the setup:
Suppose that we have the following function ##\sigma(x)=\frac{1}{x^{2-\varepsilon}}## for an arbitrary fixed ##\varepsilon>0.##
\begin{equation}
\dfrac{d}{dx}[-u'(x)]=\dfrac{1}{x^{2-\varepsilon}}u
\end{equation}
We want to verify using the bounds and using explicit form of the solution ##u##.

First we can rewrite the equation:
\begin{equation}
-u''(x)=u(x)\dfrac{1}{x^{2-\varepsilon}}
\end{equation}
Then we define a solution form of the differential equation ##u=x^{r-\varepsilon}## such that ##u## is in ##C^{2}(0,\infty)##, where ##C^{2}(0,\infty)## is the set of all continuously differentiable functions on ##(0,\infty).## Then we know that ##u''=(r-\varepsilon)(r-\varepsilon-1)x^{r-\varepsilon-2}##. Thus we have the following differential equation:
\begin{equation}
(r-\varepsilon)(r-\varepsilon-1)x^{r-\varepsilon-2}\cdotp x^{2-\varepsilon}+x^{r-\varepsilon}=0.
\end{equation}
Since #\varepsilon# is arbitrary, we can simplify the equation and factor ##x^{r-\varepsilon}## for ##x^{r-\varepsilon}>0;## therefore, we have the simplified equation:
\begin{equation}
(r-\varepsilon)(r-\varepsilon-1)+1=0.
\end{equation}
Now we must solve for ##r## in the auxiliary equation. We will expand the left-hand side and use the quadratic formula for ##r##:
\begin{equation}
r=\dfrac{2\varepsilon+1\pm \sqrt{(2\varepsilon+1)^2-4\bigg(\dfrac{(2\varepsilon+1)^2+3}{4}\bigg)}}{2}
\end{equation}
After some simplifications on the previous equations, we have the following solution:
## r=\dfrac{2\varepsilon+1\pm i\sqrt{3}}{2}.##
Now the solution to the differential equation is
##u(x)=x^{r-\varepsilon}## which implies that ##u(x)=c_1\sqrt{x}\cos(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log x)+c_2\sqrt{x}\sin(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log x)##. So we apply the one of the boundary condition that ##u(0)=0##; thus, the final solution is ##u(x)=\sqrt{x}\cos(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log x).## Now we need to check if the solution is not bounded.
In other words,
\begin{equation}
\sqrt{x}\cos\bigg(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log x\bigg)\geq \bigg(\int_{0}^{x}t^{-\varepsilon}dt\bigg)\bigg(\int_{x}^{\infty}t^{-\frac{3}{2}+\varepsilon}\cos(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log(t))dt\bigg)\\
\end{equation}
The red second integral is where I am having the most trouble on showing that it is not bounded.
Any suggestions are helpful. I thought to use a contradiction and squeeze theorem to show that the integral is not bounded.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
t:= log x, the given quantity, say f(t), is
e^{\frac{t}{2}} cos( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}t)
It would make an estimation easier.
For any given number ##A>\frac{4\pi}{\sqrt{3}} =7.25...## there exists number a such that ##A<a<2A,\ |cos( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a)|=1. ## so
|f(a)|=e^{\frac{a}{2}} &gt; e^{\frac{A}{2}} &gt; A
unbounded.
 
Last edited:
cbarker1 said:
... the final solution is ##u(x)=\sqrt{x}\cos(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log x).## Now we need to check if the solution is not bounded.

Take a sequence x_n where \cos(x_n) = 1; solving \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\log x = 2n\pi gives x_n = \exp\left( \frac{4n\pi}{\sqrt{3}} \right). Now <br /> u(x_n) = \sqrt{x_n}\cos(2n\pi) = \exp\left( \frac{2n \pi}{\sqrt{3}} \right) increases without bound as n \to \infty.

In general, if you want to find how g(x) \cos f(x) or g(x) \sin f(x) behave as x \to \infty, look at those values of x for which f(x) = n\pi (for cos) or (n + \frac12)\pi (for sin). These provide bounds for the extrema of the oscillation.
 
Last edited:
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
782
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K