Proving the Existence of Cholesky Decomposition: Lemma on Positive Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doom of Doom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decomposition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the lemma that for any positive (nxn) matrix A and any non-singular (nxn) matrix X, the matrix B defined as B=X^{\dagger}A X is also positive definite. The key insight is that instead of relying solely on the positivity of the diagonal elements of B, one should demonstrate that v^{\dagger}Bv > 0 for any non-zero vector v. This leads to the conclusion that B is positive definite, as shown through the transformation v^{\dagger}Bv = z^{\dagger}Az, where z = Xv.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of positive definite matrices
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and properties
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly vector transformations
  • Experience with complex conjugate transpose notation (X^{\dagger})
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of positive definite matrices in detail
  • Learn about matrix transformations and their implications in linear algebra
  • Explore the Cholesky decomposition and its applications in numerical methods
  • Investigate the role of non-singular matrices in linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and researchers working on matrix theory or numerical analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
I'm supposed to prove this step as part of my proof for existence of Cholesky Decomposition. I can see how to use it in my proof, but I can't seem to be able to prove this lemma:

For any positive (nxn) matrix [tex]A[/tex] and any non-singular (nxn) matrix [tex]X[/tex], prove that

[tex]B=X^{\dagger}A X[/tex]

is positive.

____

Let [tex]X=\left(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\right)[/tex], where all xi are n-vectors.

I see that
[tex]b_{i,j}=x_{i}^{\dagger}Ax_{j}[/tex],
and thus all of the diagonal elements of B are positive (from the definition of a positive matrix).

But where do I go from there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive-definite_matrix" .

In that case, you cannot conclude that the diagonal elements of B are positive.
Try to show instead directly that [tex]v^TBv>0[/tex] for [tex]v\neq 0[/tex] (this is a one-liner), then B is positive definite by definition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dur! Yeah, i meant positive definite.

I see it now. It's so easy...

For arbitrary vector [tex]v[/tex], let [tex]z = Xv[/tex], and thus [tex]z^{\dagger}=v^{\dagger}X^{\dagger}[/tex].

So [tex]v^{\dagger}Bv=v^{\dagger}X^{\dagger}AXv=z^{\dagger}Az>0[/tex].
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K