Proving the Harmonic Property of Analytic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimateguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the real and imaginary parts of an analytic function, denoted as u(x,y) and v(x,y), satisfy the condition that their Laplacians are zero, indicating that they are harmonic functions. The context involves the application of the Cauchy-Riemann conditions and the properties of analytic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct formulation of the Laplacian operator and its application to the functions u and v. There are attempts to manipulate the Cauchy-Riemann equations to derive the required results. Some participants express confusion about the implications of the hint regarding normal vectors to the curves defined by u and v.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's mathematical expressions. There is a recognition of the need to differentiate the Cauchy-Riemann equations further, but no consensus has been reached on how to directly prove that the Laplacians are zero.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there is a part b) to the problem, which may influence their approach to part a). The hint regarding constructing normal vectors is also under scrutiny, with some questioning its relevance to the current problem.

ultimateguy
Messages
122
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The functions u(x,y) and v(x,y) are the real and imaginary parts, respectively, of an analytic function w(z).
Assuming that the required derivatives exist, show that

\bigtriangledown^2 u=\bigtriangledown^2 v=0

Solutions of Laplace's equation such as u(x,y) and v(x,y) are called harmonic functions.


Homework Equations


Cauchy-Riemann conditions:

\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}
\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} = -\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}


The Attempt at a Solution


I expanded \bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta u}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} + \frac{\delta u}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} and using the Cauchy-Riemann conditions I found

\bigtriangledown^2 u = \frac{\delta v}{\delta y}\frac{\delta v}{\delta y} + \frac{\delta v}{\delta x}\frac{\delta v}{\delta x}=\bigtriangledown^2 v

What I can't figure out how to do is prove that this is equal to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your eqs. for del^2 are wrong.
\nabla^2 u=\partial_x\partial_x u+\partial_y\partial_y u.
 
Dang, you're right. Can I dot it into an element of length like this?

\bigtriangledown^2 u \bullet d\vec{r}^2 = \frac{\delta}{\delta x}\frac{\delta u}{\delta x} dx^2 + \frac{\delta}{\delta y}\frac{\delta u}{\delta y} dy^2
 
There is a hint in the problem that says I need to construct vectors normal to the curves u(x,y)=c_i and v(x,y)=c_j. Wow, I'm pretty lost.
 
The Cauchy-Riemann equations are
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}
\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}
which is what you have, allowing for your peculiar use of \delta rather than \partial!

Now just do the obvious: differentiate both sides of the first equation with respect to x and differentiate both sides of the second equation with respect to y and compare them.

Are you sure that the hint is for this particular problem? A normal vector to u(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{j}
and a normal vector to v(x,y)= c is
\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\vec{j}.
Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, that second equation is
-\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\vec{j}
which tells us the the two families of curves are orthogonal but that does not directly tell us about \nabla^2 u and \nabla^2 v.
 
Thanks for your reply.

There is a part b) to the problem, and it is this:

b) Show that

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0

I solved it easily using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so I figured that the hint was for the first part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K