Proving the Inductive Property of Natural Numbers - Can You Help?

  • Thread starter mollysmiith
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Curious
That proves that N is a subset of E. To show the reverse, assume that E is inductive. So E contains {1, 2, 3, 4, ...}. Assume that N is different from E. Then there is some n element N that is not an element of E. By assumption, E is inductive. So, by ii), 1 element E, then 2 element E, 3 element E, ... , n element E. So n + 1 element E. Absurd. So E and N are equal.
  • #1
mollysmiith
4
0
Analysis math help please!?
1. Let E be a nonempty subset of R (real numbers)

Prove that infE <= supE

2. Prove that if a > 0 then there exists n element N (natural) such that 1/n < a < n

3. A subset E of te real numbers R is an inductive set if

i) 1 element E
ii) If x element E then x + 1 element E

A real number is called a natural number if it belongs to every inductive set. The set of natural numbers is denoted by N. Recall that the principle of mathematical inductions says that if M is any subset of N that is an inductive set then M = N. Show that N = E, where E = {1,2,3,4...}

Any help would be greatly appreciated ! :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mollysmiith said:
Analysis math help please!?
1. Let E be a nonempty subset of R (real numbers)

Prove that infE <= supE
The infimum of E is defined as a lower bound for E: inf E<= x for any x in E.
The supremum of E is defined as an upper bound for E: x<= sup E for any x in E.
Put those two together. Do you see why the fact that E is non-empty is important?

2. Prove that if a > 0 then there exists n element N (natural) such that 1/n < a < n
I don't know what theorems you have to base this on but one fundamental property is the "Archimedean property": given any real number, a, there exist an integer such that a<n. Of course, if a> 1, then 1< n also so that 1/n< 1< a. If 0< a< 1, look instead at 1< 1/a< n. In that case, 1/n< a and, of course, a< 1< n.

3. A subset E of te real numbers R is an inductive set if

i) 1 element E
ii) If x element E then x + 1 element E

A real number is called a natural number if it belongs to every inductive set. The set of natural numbers is denoted by N. Recall that the principle of mathematical inductions says that if M is any subset of N that is an inductive set then M = N. Show that N = E, where E = {1,2,3,4...}
Show that every inductive set contains, at least, {1, 2, 3, 4, ...}.

Any help would be greatly appreciated ! :)
Note that the definition "inductive set" above does not restrict its members to the natural numbers. For example, the set {1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, 5/2, 4, 9/2, 5...} is an "inductive set". Another is {2/3, 1, 5/3, 2, 8/3, 3, 11/3, 4, ...}. But you can prove that N is a subset of every inductive set.
 

Related to Proving the Inductive Property of Natural Numbers - Can You Help?

What is the scientific method and how can it be used to prove a hypothesis?

The scientific method is a systematic approach to conducting scientific experiments and investigations. It involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experiments, analyzing the data, and drawing conclusions. By following this method, scientists can gather evidence and support for their hypothesis and ultimately prove or disprove it.

What are the different types of evidence that can be used to prove a hypothesis?

There are several types of evidence that can be used to support a hypothesis, including experimental evidence, statistical evidence, observational evidence, and testimonial evidence. Experimental evidence involves conducting controlled experiments to gather data and test the hypothesis. Statistical evidence involves analyzing numerical data to determine if there is a significant correlation or pattern. Observational evidence involves making observations and recording data to support the hypothesis. Testimonial evidence involves gathering information from experts or individuals with firsthand experience related to the hypothesis.

How can replication be used to prove a hypothesis?

Replication is the process of repeating an experiment or study to determine if the results are consistent and can be reproduced. Replication is a crucial aspect of the scientific method as it helps to validate the results and conclusions drawn from a study. By replicating an experiment, scientists can determine if the results are reliable and if the hypothesis can be proven.

What is peer-review and why is it important in proving a hypothesis?

Peer-review is the process of evaluation and feedback from other experts in the same field of study. Before a study or experiment is published, it undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the accuracy and validity of the results. This process helps to identify any potential flaws or biases in the study and ensures that the results are reliable and can be used to support the hypothesis.

What are the limitations of scientific proof?

While the scientific method is a reliable and systematic approach to prove a hypothesis, it is not without its limitations. Some factors, such as ethical considerations, financial constraints, and technological limitations, can affect the ability to conduct experiments and gather evidence. Additionally, new evidence or advancements in technology may lead to new interpretations or disproval of previously accepted theories, highlighting the ever-evolving nature of scientific proof.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
524
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
376
  • General Math
Replies
0
Views
825
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
957
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
927
Back
Top