Proving the Inequality for Angular Momentum Eigenstates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving an inequality related to the expectation values of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics. Specifically, it concerns an eigenstate of the operator L² and the relationship between the expectation values of the components Lₓ, Lᵧ, and L𝓏, with a focus on the conditions under which the inequality holds strictly.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the uncertainty principle to relate the expectation values of the angular momentum components. There is a debate about the assumptions regarding the eigenstate of Lₓ and Lᵧ, and whether the state must also be an eigenstate of L𝓏.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested using the uncertainty principle, while others have pointed out potential misconceptions regarding the eigenstate properties. There is no explicit consensus, but various lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's assumptions about the eigenstate may not hold universally, and there is a mention of constraints related to the eigenvalues of angular momentum. The discussion includes references to specific textbook problems and hints that may influence the approach to the inequality.

neworder1
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let \psi be an eigenstate of the operator L^{2} corresponding to the quantum number l, i. e. L^{2} \psi = \hbar l(l+1) \psi. Let <A> = <\psi|A|\psi> denote the expectation value of A in state \psi.

Prove that {|<L_{x}>|}^{2} + {|<L_{y}>|}^{2} + {|<L_{z}>|}^{2}\leq l^{2} and the inequality is strict unless \psi happens to be also an eigenstate of the opeator L_{\vec{n}} for some axis \vec_{n}.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi neworder1! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :smile:
 
Well, I just don't know how to prove it - there's a similar problem in Griffiths' textbook and the hint is to apply the uncertainty principle fo operators Lx, Ly and Lz, but I don't see how it is supposed to help - the uncertainty principle relates the expectation values of {L_{x}}^{2} and {L_{y}}^{2} to {|<L_{z}>|}^{2}.
 
\psi is a common eigenfunction of L^{}2 and L_{}z. The eigenvalues equation for L_{}z is:

L_{}z \psi=m \psi

with : -l \leqm\leq l

the mean vaue of L_{}x and L_{}y on an eigenfunction of L_{}z (\psi) is =0. The mean value of L_{}z on (\psi is =m, and we know that : m^2 <= l^2.
 
We cannot assume that \psi is the eigenstate of L_{z}. All we now is that it is some eigenstate of L^{2}.
 
In the general case it should be:

|<L^2>|=|<(L_x ^2 + L_y ^2 + L_z^2)>|= |<L_x^2>|+|<L_y^2>|+|<L_z^2>| = l^2

The root-mean-square deviation for an osservable is :

<A^2>-<A>^2>=0 <A>^2 <= <A^2>

so:

|<L_x>^2+<L_y>^2+<L_z>^2| <= |<L_x^2>|+|<L_y^2>|+|<L_z^2>| = l^2
 
That's incorrect, because <L^2> = l(l+1), not l^2.
 
Note that \langle\vec L\rangle\!\cdot\!\langle\vec L\rangle is rotationally invariant, so you can choose a convenient coordinate system.

In general, if there is some direction that is preferred for some reason, it's good to choose that to be the z direction.

Is there a preferred direction in this case?
 
Note that if you quantize angular momentum in the z-direction, then an eigenstate of L^2 with eigenvalue l(l+1) is generally a superposition of eigenstates of Lz with eigenvalues m such that |m|<=l. If it is also an eigenvalue of Lz, then it is possible that |m|=l.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K