Proving the Inequality of e^x Using Taylor's Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter AaronEx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality of e^x using Taylor's theorem, specifically showing that for 0 ≤ x ≤ a, the Taylor series expansion provides bounds for e^x. The left-hand side of the inequality is established using the Taylor series expansion up to n terms, with an error term that is non-negative, confirming the inequality holds. For the right-hand side, the argument is made that the series expansion plus an additional term remains greater than e^x, leveraging the fact that e^c ≤ e^a. Participants confirm the correctness of the approach and the reasoning behind the inequalities. The overall conclusion is that the proof using Taylor's theorem effectively demonstrates the desired inequalities for e^x.
AaronEx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that if 0 \le x \le a, and n is a natural number, then 1+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...+\frac{x^n}{n!} \le e^x \le 1+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...+\frac{x^n}{n!}+\frac{e^ax^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}

Homework Equations


I used Taylor's theorem to prove e^x is equal to the LHS of the inequality plus an error term \frac{e^cx^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}, where the series is of order n centered at x=0.


The Attempt at a Solution


With the expansion of e^x in the relevant equations section, I proved that, since the error term is greater than or equal to zero, the inequality holds true. Is this correct? As for the RHS inequality, I represented e^x as the expansion again, but this time stating that the expansion is on the interval [0,a], and so I argued that the RHS was larger than e^x since e^c \le e^a. Is this true as well? Have I left anything relevant out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
956
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
637
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K