Proving the Limit of 1/f(x) When f(x) Goes to Infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math_Geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of the function 1/f(x) as f(x) approaches infinity. The original poster seeks to establish that if the limit of f(x) as x approaches a is infinity, then the limit of 1/f(x) as x approaches a is zero, using a delta-epsilon proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the delta-epsilon definition of limits and how it applies to the given problem. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the limits of f(x) and 1/f(x). Some participants question the clarity of certain mathematical expressions and the reasoning behind shifting bounds.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various attempts to articulate the proof and clarify misunderstandings. Some participants offer guidance on structuring the proof, while others express confusion about specific terms and the implications of the limit being zero. There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the use of LaTeX for mathematical notation, which may not be rendering correctly for everyone. There is also a reference to teaching methods that some find challenging to apply effectively.

Math_Geek
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/bProve
Prove: If the limit as x goes to a of f(x)=infinity, then lim as x goes to a of 1/(f(x) =0


Homework Equations


Need to show with a delta-epsilon proof

The Attempt at a Solution



using the definition, lim as x goes to a f(x)=infinity means that for any M>0 there exists an delta>0, where a<x<a+delta implies that f(x)>M. So using this def, I know there is M>0, there exists a delta (not sure what yet) so that a<x<a+delta and taking 1/f(x) shifts the bounds a+delta<x<a and then M would be less than or equal to 0 therefore the lim as x goes to a of 1/f(x)=0.

Am I close? Please help a girl in distress! lol
Michelle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, what you need to show that, [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\frac{1}{f(x)}=0[/tex], in epsilon delta we have: [tex]\forall\epsilon>0,\exists\delta>0, such \ \ that \ \ |\frac{1}{f(x)}|<\epsilon[/tex].

using the fact that [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a}f(x)=\infty[/tex], as u stated, with a little omission, means that: For any M>0, [tex]\exists\delta>0[/tex] such that whenever

[tex]0<|x-a|<\delta[/tex] we get f(x)>M. NOw using this fact here we get that whenever

[tex]0<|x-a|<\delta[/tex] we have [tex]\frac{1}{f(x)}<\frac{1}{M}=\epsilon=>|\frac{1}{f(x)}|<\epsilon=\frac{1}{M}[/tex]

Now you only need to put everything together, because it is a little messy.

I hope this helps. But feel free to ask again, don't put too much stress on yourself!
 
Last edited:
i understand but what is [tex]? at the top, I am not sure what that is.<br /> thanks.[/tex]
 
Math_Geek said:
i understand but what is [tex]? at the top, I am not sure what that is.<br /> thanks.[/tex]
[tex] <br /> I don't know what are u talking about? I just used latex to write those math symbols, probbably your browser, or sth, is not being able to generate those symbols, because i do not see [tex]anywhere neither at the top nor at the bottom.[/tex][/tex]
 
Last edited:
that thing about shifting the bounds doesn't really make sens to me.
 
it is something our teacher showed us how to do, but it never seems to work for me. One more question, we (meaning you) showed the limit is equal to zero becasue 1/M <epsilon? I get confused because we let m>0. so how can the limit be =0.
 
Last edited:
Math_Geek said:
it is something our teacher showed us how to do, but it never seems to work for me. One more question, we (meaning you) showed the limit is equal to zero becasue 1/M <epsilon?

We, like i wrote before on my other post: We need to show that [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\frac{1}{f(x)}=0[/tex], right?? using the fact that is in there. So using epsilon delta language, it actually means that we need to show that: [tex]\forall\epsilon>0,\exists\delta>0, such \ \ that \ \ |\frac{1}{f(x)}|<\epsilon[/tex]
Right?

Now from:
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a}f(x)=\infty[/tex]
we know that for every M>0 ,[tex]\exists\delta>0[/tex] such that for every [tex]xE(a-\delta,a+\delta),[/tex] with the possible exception when x=a, we have [tex]f(x)>M[/tex], but also for that delta and for that interval we also have [tex]\frac{1}{f(x)}<\frac{1}{M}=\epsilon=>|\frac{1}{f(x )}|<\epsilon=\frac{1}{M}[/tex]

so our line at the top is fullfiled now, because we found that for every epsilon, and also for [tex]\epsilon=\frac{1}{M},\exists\delta(\epsilon)>0,[/tex] such that whenever, [tex]0<|x-a|<\delta=>|\frac{1}{f(x)}|<\frac{1}{M}=\epsilon[/tex] this is all we needed to show.
 
got it thanks
 
Math_Geek said:
got it
Good job!


Math_Geek said:
thanks


No, problem.
I love the idea behind this forum. It is blessed.
 
  • #10
yes it is!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K