Proving the Limit of a Constant Sequence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the limit of a constant sequence, defined as \( x_n = c \) for all \( n \in \mathbb{N} \), is equal to \( c \) as \( n \) approaches infinity. The focus includes the application of the formal definition of limits in the context of sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that since \( |x_i - c| = 0 < \epsilon \) for any positive integer \( i \), it follows that \( c \) is the limit of the sequence.
  • Another participant emphasizes the formal definition of the limit, stating that for all \( \epsilon > 0 \), there must exist a natural number \( k \) such that \( |x_n - c| < \epsilon \) for all \( n \geq k \).
  • A subsequent reply suggests choosing \( k = 1 \) to satisfy the limit definition, implying that the condition holds for all \( \epsilon \).
  • Another participant reinforces that since all terms in the sequence are equal to \( c \), any choice of \( N \) will lead to \( |c - c| = 0 < \epsilon \), thus supporting the claim that \( c \) is the limit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the conclusion that \( c \) is the limit of the constant sequence, but there is some discussion regarding the application of the formal definition of limits and the choice of \( k \).

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve potential ambiguities regarding the choice of \( k \) in the limit definition, nor does it clarify if there are any specific conditions under which the limit is proven.

poutsos.A
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
If a sequence {[tex]x_{n}[/tex]} is constant i.e [tex]\ x_{n}=c[/tex] for all nεN how can we prove [tex]limx_{n}[/tex]= c as x goes to infinity??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For all epsilon > 0 we have [tex]|x_i - c| = |c - c| = 0 < \epsilon[/tex] where i is any positive integer, thus c is the limit of the sequence. qed
 
But the definition of the limit of a sequence says that:

[tex]lim\ x_{n} = c[/tex] iff for all ε>0 there exists a k belonging to the natural Nos N SUCH that :

[tex]|\ x_{n}-c|<\epsilon[/tex] ,for all n[tex]\geq[/tex] k
 
poutsos.A said:
But the definition of the limit of a sequence says that:

[tex]lim\ x_{n} = c[/tex] iff for all ε>0 there exists a k belonging to the natural Nos N SUCH that :

[tex]|\ x_{n}-c|<\epsilon[/tex] ,for all n[tex]\geq[/tex] k

Ok so pick k=1 for all epsilon.
 
I don't see the problem. Since the sequence is a constant sequence, each x_i is equal to each other, so as long as we take i >= N = 1, we will have |c-c| = 0 < epsilon, proving that c is the limit of the sequence. Even if we took N = 2389472389432, any i after that is still equal to c.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K