Proving the Locally Finite Family Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Locally Finite Family Problem in topology, specifically demonstrating that the closure of the union of a locally finite family of sets A in a topological space X equals the union of the closures of the sets in A, expressed as Cl(U A) = U (Cl(A)). The proof involves showing that if a point x is in Cl(U A), it must be contained in the closure of some set in A, leveraging the locally finite property. The discussion also addresses the reverse inclusion, confirming that if x is in U (Cl(A)), it cannot be outside Cl(U A), thus establishing the equality definitively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of closure in topology
  • Knowledge of locally finite families of sets
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of closure in topological spaces
  • Learn about locally finite families and their implications in topology
  • Explore the finite intersection property and its relevance in proofs
  • Investigate examples of topological spaces to apply these concepts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology, as well as educators and researchers interested in advanced concepts related to set theory and topological properties.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Let X be a topological space, and A a locally finite family of sets in X (i.e. such a family of sets that every point in X has a neighborhood which intersects a finite number of sets in A). One needs to show that Cl(U A) = U (Cl(A)) (i.e. the closure of the union of sets in A equals the union of the closures of sets in A).

The Attempt at a Solution



Inclusion [tex]\subseteq[/tex]. Let x be in Cl(U A). Then every neighborhood of x intersects U A. Since A is locally finite, there exists some neighborhood N of x which intersects A in a finite number of sets.

This is where I'm stuck, right at the beginning. Somehow, I need to show that this very x is contained in some set of the family A, since then it's contained in U (Cl(A)), too. Any push in the right direction is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let V be a neighbourhood of x intersecting A1,A2,...An. Assume the contrary, that x doesn't belong to the closure of any Ai.Then, we can choose a neighbourhood Vi of x which doesn't intersect Ai for each i.
The intersection W of V & Vi (1<=i<=n) is open & doesn't intersect any of A's & hence is not in U A. Therefore, x is not in Cl(U A), a contradiction.
 
Eynstone said:
Let V be a neighbourhood of x intersecting A1,A2,...An. Assume the contrary, that x doesn't belong to the closure of any Ai.Then, we can choose a neighbourhood Vi of x which doesn't intersect Ai for each i.
The intersection W of V & Vi (1<=i<=n) is open & doesn't intersect any of A's & hence is not in U A. Therefore, x is not in Cl(U A), a contradiction.

Eynstone, thanks a lot. So, for the other inclusion, it's similar: let x be in U (Cl(A)), then every neighborhood of x intersects at least one set from A, and if we assume the contrary, i.e. that x is not in Cl(U A), then there exists some neighborhood of x which doesn't intersect any set from the family A, which is clearly a contradiction. (Although I didn't use the finite intersection property here, but perhaps I don't need to, if this is okay.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
581
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K