Proving the Moon Landing: Facts and Evidence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenge of convincing skeptics of the moon landing's authenticity. Key points include the use of NASA's lunar laser ranging experiments, which provide empirical evidence of human activity on the moon, and the international collaboration of ground stations in California, Spain, and Australia that received signals from Apollo missions. The conversation highlights the futility of debating with individuals who refuse to accept credible evidence, emphasizing that some people may remain unconvinced regardless of the facts presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lunar laser ranging experiments
  • Familiarity with the Apollo program and its missions
  • Knowledge of conspiracy theory dynamics
  • Awareness of NASA's historical contributions to space exploration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research lunar laser ranging techniques and their significance
  • Explore the Apollo program's mission details and outcomes
  • Investigate the role of international ground stations in space communication
  • Examine psychological aspects of belief in conspiracy theories
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for educators, science communicators, and anyone involved in debunking conspiracy theories, particularly regarding space exploration and the moon landing.

ryder
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have 2 close friends who believe we've never been to the moon. I've tried explaining to them why the flag moved, why there is no need to go back, etc, and it falls on deaf ears.

This morning i saw this video by NASA [ http://ca.news.yahoo.com/see-Earth's-moon-evolved-nasa-videos-140012773.html ] and it motivated me to make my two friends understand once and fore all.

Aside from what you can find on google, do you PF'ers have a few in your face facts or outright proof that I could tell these two?

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1972: THE MOON LANDINGS ARE FAKED!

2012: ... aked ...aked ...aked ...aked ...

-------
Edit:
Ok, I couldn't help it, it was too tempting.

As I feel guilty for not contributing anything, here are some links with further links:
Wikipedia
Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy
That Mythbusters episode (it's true! I saw it on TV!)
The three antennas receiving the signal from the Apollo spacecraft (one in California, one in Spain, one in Australia - so the conspiracy is international)
... and more ... (Google)
 
Last edited:
As Penguiny said above, your two friends are unlikely to believe any proof that you can get. Actually, I would point this out to them and ask them what proof they would accept. If it's something unreasonable, or if they won't accept any proof, then just tell them that if they won't accept any reasonable proof then maybe they should go to the moon themselves.

Honestly it's not an argument you can win. Someone who doesn't believe what you are saying or the evidence you present will almost never concede.
 
ryder said:
I have 2 close friends who believe we've never been to the moon. I've tried explaining to them why the flag moved, why there is no need to go back, etc, and it falls on deaf ears.

This morning i saw this video by NASA [ http://ca.news.yahoo.com/see-Earth's-moon-evolved-nasa-videos-140012773.html ] and it motivated me to make my two friends understand once and fore all.

Aside from what you can find on google, do you PF'ers have a few in your face facts or outright proof that I could tell these two?

Thanks!

Welcome to the PF.

When you re-read the Rules link at the top of the page, you will notice that Moon Landing Conspiracies are on the Banned Topics list. Thread closed.

PF Rules said:
Moon landing hoax conspiracy theories

Search PF for many related threads. If any open threads are discovered, please report them to the staff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K