Proving the Number of SDRs in a Collection of Sets: A Mathematical Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter junho
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a collection of sets A1, A2, ..., An, containing 2, 3, ..., n+1 elements respectively, has at least 2^n System of Distinct Representatives (SDRs). Participants explore the mathematical conditions under which this holds true, specifically referencing the factorial equations k! and k!/(k-n)! to analyze the relationship between k and n. The conclusion drawn is that to achieve exactly 2^n SDRs, each successive set must introduce two new elements not present in the previous sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial mathematics
  • Familiarity with the concept of System of Distinct Representatives (SDR)
  • Knowledge of factorial notation and its properties
  • Basic principles of set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of System of Distinct Representatives (SDR) in combinatorial contexts
  • Explore advanced topics in combinatorial mathematics, such as the Erdős–Szekeres theorem
  • Learn about the applications of factorial equations in combinatorial proofs
  • Investigate the relationship between set sizes and SDRs in various mathematical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of combinatorial theory, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of System of Distinct Representatives and related mathematical proofs.

junho
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Suppose A1,A2,...,An contain 2,3,...,n+1 elements, respectively. Show that this collection has at least 2^n SDRs. Find such a collection with exactly 2^n SDRs



2. These are the only equations given in my notes regarding "the number of SDRs a collection of sets has"
k! if k <= n
k!/(k-n)! if k > n




3. Ok, for part one of the question, I know that I have to show that k! > 2^n. I can't seem to decide what k is in this case, is k = 2? or is k variable for each set within the collection?

And for part 2, I'm just doing my best to guess, but to have exactly 2^n SDR's I think that each successive set in the collection must have 2 elements that don't exist in the previous set. Is my line of thinking correct?

Thank you in advance for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be helpful if you would define "DR" and "SDR" here.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It might be helpful if you would define "DR" and "SDR" here.

Sorry. I'll do just that.

First of all, DR was a typo.
SDR = System of Distinct Representatives
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K