Proving the One Sided Limit Theorem: A Rigorous Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter RPierre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the One Sided Limit Theorem, specifically the relationship between the limit of a function as x approaches a point and the behavior of its one-sided limits. The subject area is calculus, focusing on limits and epsilon-delta proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of proving two implications: one where the limit of f(x) as x approaches c leads to both one-sided limits also approaching L, and the converse. There are attempts to outline cases for the proof, including the use of epsilon-delta definitions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the proof, particularly in breaking down the epsilon-delta conditions for both one-sided limits. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a rigorous proof, and while some progress has been made, not all aspects have been fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of constructing a general proof as opposed to specific examples, indicating a potential gap in understanding the rigorous application of the theorem.

RPierre
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the limit as x->c of f(x) = L if and only if both one sided limits also = L


Homework Equations


Has to be an epsilon delta proof

The Attempt at a Solution


Being an if and only if, I have to do two cases : If A, then B. and if NOT A, then NOT B, logically.

Case 1:
Let lim x->c from the left be L, and lim x->c from the right be L.

then if [tex]c - \delta < x < c then |f(x) - L| < \epsilon[/tex]

and if [tex]c < x < c + \delta then |f(x) - L| < \epsilon[/tex]

Case 2:

Let lim x->c from the left = M, and lim x->c from the right = N.

This is all I have really rationalized I am kind of stumped how to do a rigorous proof of this, I.e. I know how to do specific proofs but not a rigorous general proof. \

Can anyone offer any help / a starting point =/ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, we have two things to prove: 1) if f(x) goes to L as x goes to c, then both one sided limits also approach L. 2) If both one sided limits go to L for x approaching c, then f(x) goes to L as x goes to c.

For 1) we know that for every positive epsilon, there exists a positive delta such that [tex]|f(x) - L| < \epsilon[/tex] if [tex]|x - c| < \delta[/tex]. We can rewrite [tex]|x-c| < \delta[/tex] as [tex]c - \delta < x < c + \delta[/tex]. Now, say we're examining the right handed limit of f(x) as x->c, then we only look at the interval [tex]x < c + \delta[/tex], right? And with the left handed limits we only look at the interval [tex]c - \delta < x[/tex]. You should be able to prove it now.

2) Look at the delta-interval of both one-sided limits and "put them together".
 
Is it possible to continue the solution? I can find the (1).
 
For 2), you're going to assume that both one-sided limits exist. So for every positive epsilon, there is a positive delta such that [tex]c - x < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - L| < \delta[/tex] and [tex]x - c < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - L|[/tex].

Put the two delta inequalities together to get [tex]c - \delta < x < c + \delta \Rightarrow |c - x| < \delta \left[/tex], which we know implies [tex]|f(x) - L| < \epsilon[/tex].
 
thnxxx mate.. I found it after a while... have a nice day...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K